{"id":6503,"date":"2026-09-06T13:44:33","date_gmt":"2026-09-06T13:44:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/?p=6503"},"modified":"2026-09-06T13:44:33","modified_gmt":"2026-09-06T13:44:33","slug":"part-6-richard-tried-to-turn-my-career-into-his-shield-but-the-ethics-review-forced-every-decision-into-the-light","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/?p=6503","title":{"rendered":"PART 6 \u2013 Richard Tried to Turn My Career Into His Shield, but the Ethics Review Forced Every Decision Into the Light"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The ethics panel convened at nine the next morning.<\/p>\n<p>I had presided over hearings involving murder convictions, constitutional challenges, multimillion-dollar disputes, and political scandals.<\/p>\n<p>None made me feel as exposed as sitting on the opposite side of a judicial conference table while three retired judges examined my conduct.<\/p>\n<p>My counsel, Andrea Cho, sat beside me.<\/p>\n<p>Across from us, Richard\u2019s attorneys occupied nearly half the room.<\/p>\n<p>Richard himself did not attend.<\/p>\n<p>That was deliberate.<\/p>\n<p>His lawyers wanted this to look institutional, not personal.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Helen Mercer chaired the panel. She was seventy-one, silver-haired, and famously intolerant of theatrics.<\/p>\n<p>She opened the hearing without ceremony.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are not here to adjudicate the allegations against Mr. Sterling, his son, the school district, or any other person. We are here to determine whether Chief Judge Elena Vance misused judicial authority after learning her child had been injured.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>No one moved.<\/p>\n<p>Mercer looked at me.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cJudge Vance, do you understand?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you contact law enforcement?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you direct anyone to arrest Richard Sterling?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you request warrants?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you threaten school officials with your office?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you identify yourself as chief judge when you arrived at Oak Creek Elementary?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One of Richard\u2019s lawyers stood.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMadam Chair, the record shows judicial security arrived shortly after Judge Vance entered the school.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mercer did not look at him.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou will have your turn.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He sat.<\/p>\n<p>Mercer continued.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen did judicial security become involved?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAfter Richard Sterling threatened my employment, my daughter\u2019s schooling, and my ability to pursue legal remedies. He also moved toward me while demanding my phone.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you summon security?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI contacted my court administrator for guidance regarding preservation of threats made against a judicial officer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you tell Ms. Cole to bring security?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Miriam testified next.<\/p>\n<p>She explained that my clerk had alerted her to the unusual circumstances. She had independently consulted judicial security protocol after learning threats had been made against me while I was alone at the school.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid Chief Judge Vance tell you to intimidate Mr. Sterling?\u201d Mercer asked.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid she ask you to remove anyone?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cArrest anyone?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThreaten anyone?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat did she ask?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Miriam opened her notes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo ensure records connected to threats against a judicial officer were preserved through appropriate channels and to keep her professional role separated from her role as parent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Richard\u2019s attorney rose when permitted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMs. Cole, isn\u2019t the arrival of judicial security inherently intimidating?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt can be.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd Chief Judge Vance knew that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe also knew Mr. Sterling had just threatened her.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWas he armed?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnknown.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid he strike her?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen why escalate?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Miriam looked at him.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBecause security decisions are not made by waiting to see whether a threat becomes a physical assault.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The lawyer changed direction.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid Judge Vance benefit from preferential treatment?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Miriam answered without hesitation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe received additional restrictions that an ordinary complainant would not have faced.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That silenced the room.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cExplain,\u201d Mercer said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOnce her identity became relevant, every investigative decision required conflict review. She was barred from direct witness contact. Her communications were logged. She was instructed not to access materials that another victim\u2019s parent might ordinarily receive. Her professional position created more procedural barriers, not fewer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I kept my face still.<\/p>\n<p>It was true.<\/p>\n<p>And exactly right.<\/p>\n<p>The panel then reviewed my recording.<\/p>\n<p>Richard\u2019s voice filled the room.<\/p>\n<p>You want to call the police? Go ahead. The chief and I play golf.<\/p>\n<p>A moment later:<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ll start by making sure Lily never attends a decent school in this county again.<\/p>\n<p>Then:<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ll find out where you work.<\/p>\n<p>The audio ended.<\/p>\n<p>Nobody spoke for several seconds.<\/p>\n<p>Richard\u2019s lawyer finally said, \u201cThose statements were made before Mr. Sterling learned of Judge Vance\u2019s office.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mercer looked at him.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am aware of chronology.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy point is that he could not have intended to threaten a judicial officer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo,\u201d Mercer said. \u201cHe appears to have intended to threaten a mother.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The lawyer sat down.<\/p>\n<p>The review lasted six hours.<\/p>\n<p>Every call.<\/p>\n<p>Every message.<\/p>\n<p>Every record request.<\/p>\n<p>My clerk testified that I had explicitly instructed him to use only publicly available documents and formal channels.<\/p>\n<p>Ruiz submitted a declaration confirming I had not directed investigative decisions.<\/p>\n<p>The attorney general\u2019s office stated that it had assumed coordination specifically to avoid the appearance of influence.<\/p>\n<p>Even the school secretary provided a written statement explaining that she had independently copied the stairwell video before I arrived.<\/p>\n<p>By midafternoon, I was exhausted.<\/p>\n<p>Not because I feared what they would find.<\/p>\n<p>Because integrity is tedious to prove.<\/p>\n<p>It exists in the boring details.<\/p>\n<p>Who called whom.<\/p>\n<p>At what time.<\/p>\n<p>Under what authority.<\/p>\n<p>Which request was made.<\/p>\n<p>Which request was refused.<\/p>\n<p>Whether every boundary remained visible.<\/p>\n<p>At four thirty, the panel recessed.<\/p>\n<p>Andrea and I stepped into the courthouse courtyard.<\/p>\n<p>Reporters lined the sidewalk behind barricades.<\/p>\n<p>Cameras lifted the moment they saw me.<\/p>\n<p>I said nothing.<\/p>\n<p>Andrea handed me a bottle of water.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou did well.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI answered questions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat is doing well at an ethics hearing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat do you think?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think the complaint is strategically weak and publicly effective.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMeaning?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMeaning even if they clear you, half the headlines will say ETHICS PANEL INVESTIGATES CHIEF JUDGE.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She watched me.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou could issue a statement.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNot yet.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019re allowed to defend yourself.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m also Lily\u2019s mother, a fact witness, and chief judge. Every sentence I say will be used somewhere else.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Andrea smiled faintly.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat is why your statements are boring.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBoring is underrated.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My phone rang.<\/p>\n<p>Mom.<\/p>\n<p>I stepped away.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Her voice came fast.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNothing bad. Lily\u2019s fine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My body relaxed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen why are you calling like the house is on fire?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBecause someone drove past twice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I stopped.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat kind of car?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBlack SUV. Tinted windows.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you get the plate?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPartial.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs Lily inside?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLock everything.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cElena, I already\u2014\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCall local police. Not me. Local police.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There was a pause.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou think it\u2019s Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I hated saying it.<\/p>\n<p>Speculation would turn fear into certainty.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCall the police and give them the plate.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI will.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I called Ruiz next through the approved line.<\/p>\n<p>She listened.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ll check it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDo not tell me anything I\u2019m not entitled to know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou really are difficult.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cProfessionally.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGo home when the ethics panel releases you.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The panel\u2019s ruling arrived at six twelve.<\/p>\n<p>Unanimous.<\/p>\n<p>No evidence of misuse of judicial authority.<\/p>\n<p>No evidence that I directed criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>No evidence of improper use of court personnel.<\/p>\n<p>The panel did criticize one thing: entering the principal\u2019s office while emotionally involved in an incident concerning my child created foreseeable complications.<\/p>\n<p>Fair.<\/p>\n<p>They recommended that I delegate all further institutional communication about Lily\u2019s case through counsel.<\/p>\n<p>Also fair.<\/p>\n<p>I accepted the findings publicly in a statement of four sentences.<\/p>\n<p>No triumph.<\/p>\n<p>No attack on Richard.<\/p>\n<p>No mention of Rebecca\u2019s recording.<\/p>\n<p>The news cycle exploded anyway.<\/p>\n<p>CHIEF JUDGE CLEARED.<\/p>\n<p>STERLING COMPLAINT REJECTED.<\/p>\n<p>ETHICS PANEL: VANCE DID NOT ABUSE OFFICE.<\/p>\n<p>By the time I reached home, two patrol cars were parked on our street.<\/p>\n<p>My mother opened the door before I reached it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat did they find?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNothing yet.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhere\u2019s Lily?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUpstairs.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I climbed immediately.<\/p>\n<p>Her bedroom door was open.<\/p>\n<p>She sat cross-legged on the bed, cast resting on a pillow, reading.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou okay?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She looked up.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGrandma says I\u2019m not allowed near windows.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor now.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs that dramatic?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs it Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She closed the book.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid you lose your job?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Her face brightened.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey said I didn\u2019t break the rules.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI knew you didn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I sat beside her.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKnowing and proving are different.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou said that yesterday.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI did.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo Richard lost?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I shook my head.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis still isn\u2019t a game.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She made a face.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou always say that when you\u2019re winning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I stared at her.<\/p>\n<p>She smiled.<\/p>\n<p>I laughed despite myself.<\/p>\n<p>Downstairs, Ruiz arrived twenty minutes later.<\/p>\n<p>She brought no files.<\/p>\n<p>Only herself.<\/p>\n<p>That told me whatever she came to say had direct relevance to our safety.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe SUV was rented,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBy whom?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA private security firm.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My mother crossed her arms.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRichard.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ruiz held up one hand.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe firm has performed work for Sterling companies. We have not established who ordered today\u2019s surveillance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSurveillance?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat appears to be what it was.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My mother said, \u201cYou know enough to put police here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe know enough to be cautious.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I appreciated the distinction.<\/p>\n<p>Ruiz looked at me.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s another development.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSomeone attempted to access Lily\u2019s medical file.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Every muscle in my body tightened.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA user account belonging to a billing contractor.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLegitimate access?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis morning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWas anything opened?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAccess was blocked by the hospital\u2019s privacy system because the user account lacked pediatric clearance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My mother swore quietly.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs that connected to Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re investigating.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I stood.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat could he want?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ruiz watched me.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat question assumes he ordered it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFine. What could anyone want from Lily\u2019s medical file?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo challenge the injuries.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOr find something embarrassing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The cruelty of it made me nauseated.<\/p>\n<p>Lily was eleven.<\/p>\n<p>Her broken arm had become evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Her concussion had become leverage.<\/p>\n<p>Her medical privacy had become another wall someone might try to climb.<\/p>\n<p>Ruiz continued.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re recommending temporary protective measures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI agree.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSchool too.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe hasn\u2019t returned.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My mother looked toward the stairs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe wants to go Monday.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ruiz\u2019s expression softened.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen we plan for Monday.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After she left, I checked every lock myself.<\/p>\n<p>Ridiculous perhaps.<\/p>\n<p>Necessary emotionally.<\/p>\n<p>Near midnight, Andrea called.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou need to see tomorrow\u2019s newspaper.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSterling\u2019s team leaked a statement.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat does it say?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe claims Lily has a history of behavioral problems.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I went cold.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe doesn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe\u2019s attacking an eleven-year-old.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat evidence?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNone included.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n<p>Then Andrea added, \u201cThere\u2019s more.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOf course there is.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey claim confidential school records support their position.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I opened my eyes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat records?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey don\u2019t say.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey shouldn\u2019t have any.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd if they do?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat creates another problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I walked into the dark kitchen.<\/p>\n<p>On the refrigerator, Lily\u2019s spelling test hung beneath a magnet.<\/p>\n<p>Ninety-six percent.<\/p>\n<p>She had drawn a smiley face beside the teacher\u2019s note.<\/p>\n<p>Ordinary childhood.<\/p>\n<p>That was what Richard kept trying to invade.<\/p>\n<p>The next morning, the newspaper arrived digitally at five forty.<\/p>\n<p>Richard\u2019s statement appeared beneath his attorney\u2019s name.<\/p>\n<p>It described Lily as \u201ca student with a documented history of interpersonal conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>No source.<\/p>\n<p>No specifics.<\/p>\n<p>No supporting record.<\/p>\n<p>But people online repeated it instantly.<\/p>\n<p>Then, at seven ten, Dr. Wells called.<\/p>\n<p>Her voice was furious.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cElena, I need you to know something.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLily has no disciplinary history.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo. I mean none. Not one referral. Not one suspension. Not one behavioral warning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen where did their claim come from?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe just discovered someone created entries in the school system last night.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I stood very still.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat kind of entries?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThree behavioral incidents.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBackdated?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo when?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne from last semester. Two from this year.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWho created them?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re tracing the login.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My voice dropped.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPreserve everything.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAlready done.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDoes Ruiz know?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I looked toward the stairs.<\/p>\n<p>Richard had threatened to make everyone believe my daughter was a liar.<\/p>\n<p>Now someone was rewriting her school record.<\/p>\n<p>Not metaphorically.<\/p>\n<p>Literally.<\/p>\n<p>By breakfast, the ethics complaint against me had collapsed.<\/p>\n<p>But a far more dangerous line had been crossed.<\/p>\n<p>Someone was no longer merely hiding the past.<\/p>\n<p>They were manufacturing one.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<h2><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/?p=6504\">Click Here to continue read next: PART7: Someone Rewrote Lily\u2019s School Record Overnight, and the Digital Trail Led Straight Toward the People Richard Trusted Most<\/a><\/strong><\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The ethics panel convened at nine the next morning. I had presided over hearings involving murder convictions, constitutional challenges, multimillion-dollar disputes, and political scandals. None made me feel as exposed &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6497,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6503"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6503\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6515,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6503\/revisions\/6515"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6497"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}