January fourth stopped feeling like a date and became a test.<\/p>\n
Every morning, Daniel\u2019s team checked for hidden automation.<\/p>\n
Every afternoon, outside cybersecurity firms repeated the search independently.<\/p>\n
Every evening, Mercer updated us on newly identified accounts, devices, and communications.<\/p>\n
Nothing new appeared.<\/p>\n
That should have relaxed me.<\/p>\n
It didn't.<\/p>\n
I had learned too much about systems that looked quiet.<\/p>\n
The environmental investigation continued at the same time.<\/p>\n
That was harder.<\/p>\n
Fraud gave me villains.<\/p>\n
Groundwater gave me chemistry.<\/p>\n
Chemistry did not care whether I had been deceived.<\/p>\n
On December thirtieth, the first comprehensive testing map arrived.<\/p>\n
Henderson contained three major contamination zones.<\/p>\n
Parcel Seven was worst.<\/p>\n
The old quarry plume extended northeast.<\/p>\n
Pit Four affected groundwater near two undeveloped neighboring tracts.<\/p>\n
A smaller plume sat beneath land Holt Ridge had purchased eighteen months earlier.<\/p>\n
No occupied homes currently tested above safety thresholds.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
But several private wells required ongoing monitoring.<\/p>\n
Holt Ridge offered bottled water and temporary filtration to every potentially affected household before regulators required it.<\/p>\n
One investor called that premature.<\/p>\n
I called it Tuesday.<\/p>\n
Evelyn warned me not to phrase it that way in formal meetings.<\/p>\n
The estimated remediation range remained broad.<\/p>\n
Twenty-two million.<\/p>\n
Maybe fifty.<\/p>\n
Potentially more if groundwater migration proved extensive.<\/p>\n
Holt Ridge did not have fifty million dollars sitting idle.<\/p>\n
Nobody does.<\/p>\n
Daniel and I spent an afternoon with accountants.<\/p>\n
Cash reserves after securing payroll:<\/p>\n
$8.7 million.<\/p>\n
Accessible credit:<\/p>\n
approximately $11 million, though lenders were reviewing exposure.<\/p>\n
Unencumbered assets could support more.<\/p>\n
Insurance coverage uncertain because contamination predated our ownership and historical disclosures were incomplete.<\/p>\n
Claims against former owners and responsible parties existed.<\/p>\n
So did claims against conspirators.<\/p>\n
None produced immediate cleanup money.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can survive,\u201d Daniel said.<\/p>\n
\u201cDefine survive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCompany continues.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmployees?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMost.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMost isn't all.\u201d<\/p>\n
He looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou asked me to define it.\u201d<\/p>\n
I hated the answer because it was honest.<\/p>\n
We had frozen Henderson construction.<\/p>\n
Three crews could be reassigned.<\/p>\n
Two could not.<\/p>\n
Consultants.<\/p>\n
Site staff.<\/p>\n
Project-specific employees.<\/p>\n
Forty-seven people were directly tied to Henderson work.<\/p>\n
Some could move to other projects.<\/p>\n
Not everyone.<\/p>\n
Ward had planned to empty payroll.<\/p>\n
The truth might force me to reduce it anyway.<\/p>\n
That irony hurt.<\/p>\n
Carla came into my office at five.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're doing the face.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat face?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one where you decide everybody\u2019s problem belongs to you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't have that face.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou absolutely do.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sat without asking.<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople know Henderson is paused.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey're scared.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTell them what you know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don't know enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen tell them that.\u201d<\/p>\n
Simple.<\/p>\n
I scheduled another all-hands.<\/p>\n
No grand speech.<\/p>\n
No promises I couldn't guarantee.<\/p>\n
I explained the contamination.<\/p>\n
The cash position.<\/p>\n
The project pause.<\/p>\n
The fact that some roles might change.<\/p>\n
Nobody applauded.<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
This was not an applause meeting.<\/p>\n
One project manager asked whether layoffs were coming.<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another asked when.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
A superintendent asked whether executives would take cuts first.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel looked at me.<\/p>\n
We had not discussed that.<\/p>\n
He nodded anyway.<\/p>\n
After the meeting, Evelyn called.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou should stop making compensation commitments before consulting governance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don't have a board that can fire me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is not the reassuring sentence you think it is.\u201d<\/p>\n
She was right.<\/p>\n
Holt Ridge\u2019s ownership structure had grown faster than its governance.<\/p>\n
I still controlled the company.<\/p>\n
Daniel held a minority stake.<\/p>\n
Several early investors had preferred economic rights without management involvement.<\/p>\n
For years that flexibility helped us move quickly.<\/p>\n
Now it looked like another vulnerability.<\/p>\n
Ward had exploited founder-centered systems because I had built founder-centered systems.<\/p>\n
Not intentionally.<\/p>\n
Not dishonestly.<\/p>\n
Still true.<\/p>\n
That evening, Daniel placed a folder on my desk.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat's this?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe audit.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat audit?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one you asked for when we started finding Ward\u2019s access.\u201d<\/p>\n
A forensic accounting firm had reviewed Holt Ridge from incorporation forward.<\/p>\n
Not merely fraud.<\/p>\n
Everything.<\/p>\n
Expenses.<\/p>\n
Approvals.<\/p>\n
Related-party transactions.<\/p>\n
Compliance.<\/p>\n
Tax handling.<\/p>\n
Contracting.<\/p>\n
I opened it.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow bad?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDepends how defensive you feel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTry me.\u201d<\/p>\n
The first issues were minor.<\/p>\n
Missing signatures.<\/p>\n
Late filings.<\/p>\n
Inconsistent approval records from our first two years.<\/p>\n
Then one section stopped me.<\/p>\n
Hanover acquisition.<\/p>\n
The first property.<\/p>\n
The foundation of Holt Ridge.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel pointed.<\/p>\n
\u201cOur environmental disclosure.\u201d<\/p>\n
I read.<\/p>\n
The seller questionnaire contained a line about prior industrial use on an adjacent parcel.<\/p>\n
Marked:<\/p>\n
Unknown.<\/p>\n
But an earlier draft, found in email archives, said:<\/p>\n
Former Lawson Aggregate operations nearby; possible historical dumping reported but unverified.<\/p>\n
My pulse changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho changed it?\u201d<\/p>\n
The final form had been prepared by our closing attorney.<\/p>\n
Not me.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid we know?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel opened an email.<\/p>\n
From the attorney.<\/p>\n
To me.<\/p>\n
Six years earlier.<\/p>\n
Miranda \u2014 seller has no records confirming dumping. Recommend using final verified disclosure rather than rumor language.<\/p>\n
My reply:<\/p>\n
Fine. Use whatever is standard.<\/p>\n
I stared at it.<\/p>\n
There.<\/p>\n
My words.<\/p>\n
No forgery.<\/p>\n
No Ward.<\/p>\n
No Brooke.<\/p>\n
Me.<\/p>\n
I remembered the day.<\/p>\n
I had been twenty-six.<\/p>\n
Terrified the financing would fall apart.<\/p>\n
Working sixteen-hour days.<\/p>\n
The possible dumping sounded like an old rumor about neighboring industrial land, not Hanover itself.<\/p>\n
The attorney said standard disclosure was enough.<\/p>\n
I accepted it.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid we violate anything?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProbably not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's not what I asked.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel understood.<\/p>\n
\u201cLegally, counsel thinks no.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEthically?\u201d<\/p>\n
He didn't answer for me.<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
I read the email again.<\/p>\n
Use whatever is standard.<\/p>\n
How many times had I criticized everyone else for accepting convenient explanations?<\/p>\n
I had one too.<\/p>\n
Not equivalent to forging signatures.<\/p>\n
Not equivalent to burying drums.<\/p>\n
But mine.<\/p>\n
I could have asked.<\/p>\n
Could have investigated.<\/p>\n
Could have learned more about Lawson Aggregate before buying Hanover.<\/p>\n
Maybe I would have discovered contamination years earlier.<\/p>\n
Maybe not.<\/p>\n
But I had chosen speed over curiosity.<\/p>\n
The audit found another issue.<\/p>\n
Our earliest investors had received projections based on redevelopment assumptions that did not discuss industrial contamination risk.<\/p>\n
Because we did not believe it existed.<\/p>\n
Still, the old email meant there had been a hint.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do we do?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel looked surprised.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're asking me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTell Evelyn.\u201d<\/p>\n
We did.<\/p>\n
She read the documents.<\/p>\n
Then said, \u201cYou did not commit fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour attorney made a defensible disclosure decision.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou are not required to confess negligence that may not exist.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy do I feel you're about to do something expensive?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause you're perceptive.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn sighed.<\/p>\n
We notified the forensic environmental team.<\/p>\n
Then our insurers.<\/p>\n
Then affected investors.<\/p>\n
Not publicly at first.<\/p>\n
Directly.<\/p>\n
We gave them the email.<\/p>\n
The earlier draft.<\/p>\n
The final disclosure.<\/p>\n
No hiding.<\/p>\n
One investor was furious.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou knew there might be dumping.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew there was an unverified reference to possible historical dumping near Hanover.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds like lawyer wording.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is precise wording.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould you have invested if you knew?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s not good enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I let him be angry.<\/p>\n
That was new.<\/p>\n
Old Miranda would have tried to make him feel better.<\/p>\n
New Miranda answered questions.<\/p>\n
He asked whether I planned to resign.<\/p>\n
The question surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I don't think leaving improves cleanup or governance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou made the decision.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen who holds you accountable?\u201d<\/p>\n
There.<\/p>\n
The real question.<\/p>\n
I had spent weeks demanding accountability from family and conspirators.<\/p>\n
What did accountability look like when the mistake was mine?<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm working on that.\u201d<\/p>\n
After the call, I asked Evelyn to design an independent board structure.<\/p>\n
She stared at me through the screen.<\/p>\n
\u201cNow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDuring a criminal investigation, environmental crisis, and liquidity review?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTerrible timing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBest timing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel agreed.<\/p>\n
Three independent directors.<\/p>\n
Environmental expertise.<\/p>\n
Finance.<\/p>\n
Community development.<\/p>\n
Real authority.<\/p>\n
Not decorative advisers.<\/p>\n
The founder would no longer be the final answer to every question.<\/p>\n
It felt frightening.<\/p>\n
Therefore probably necessary.<\/p>\n
Dad called that evening.<\/p>\n
He had heard about the Hanover email from Mom, who heard from me earlier.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou didn't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew enough to ask another question.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were twenty-six.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can't blame yourself for Walter.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSounds like it.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked out at the dark office.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere's a difference between blame and responsibility.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad was quiet.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou taught me that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI think you taught me.\u201d<\/p>\n
Maybe both.<\/p>\n
The next morning, environmental investigators uncovered something that reduced my potential mistake without erasing it.<\/p>\n
The rumor referenced in the Hanover draft came from a county note.<\/p>\n
The note described dumping \u201cnear former Lawson Aggregate operations.\u201d<\/p>\n
Coordinates had been omitted.<\/p>\n
Historical maps showed the dumping area was believed to be two miles away.<\/p>\n
Not Parcel Seven.<\/p>\n
Not Henderson.<\/p>\n
Our attorney had reasonably considered the report too vague for formal disclosure.<\/p>\n
I felt relief.<\/p>\n
Then discomfort about feeling relief.<\/p>\n
Facts were facts.<\/p>\n
I didn't need guilt to prove morality.<\/p>\n
I needed action.<\/p>\n
We continued the investigation anyway.<\/p>\n
At noon, Mercer called.<\/p>\n
\u201cWard wants to talk to you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe specifically requested you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says it's about January fourth.\u201d<\/p>\n
That changed nothing.<\/p>\n
\u201cAsk him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe won't tell us.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn advised against direct contact.<\/p>\n
Mercer agreed.<\/p>\n
Ward\u2019s attorney then delivered a written note.<\/p>\n
One sentence:<\/p>\n
You stopped the release, but you have not stopped the choice.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat choice?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nobody knew.<\/p>\n
Ward refused explanation.<\/p>\n
Aaron was shown the note.<\/p>\n
He recognized the phrasing.<\/p>\n
\u201cWard used that when talking about Miranda\u2019s parents.\u201d<\/p>\n
My skin tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat choice?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said the family would eventually have to choose which daughter to save.\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt suddenly cold.<\/p>\n
Brooke.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
Aaron didn't know.<\/p>\n
Mercer increased protection around my parents and Brooke.<\/p>\n
Brooke was moved to a secure location.<\/p>\n
Mom and Dad were already protected.<\/p>\n
No physical threat appeared.<\/p>\n
Then Daniel found something in the eleventh device.<\/p>\n
A second encrypted partition.<\/p>\n
Hidden beneath the payroll files.<\/p>\n
Inside were documents dated January fourth.<\/p>\n
Two legal complaints.<\/p>\n
One named me.<\/p>\n
The other named Brooke.<\/p>\n
The complaint against me alleged financial fraud.<\/p>\n
Expected.<\/p>\n
The complaint against Brooke contained real evidence.<\/p>\n
Identity theft.<\/p>\n
Trust fraud.<\/p>\n
Unauthorized account access.<\/p>\n
Cayman transfers.<\/p>\n
Enough to destroy any claim she had been merely manipulated.<\/p>\n
Ward planned to release one complaint publicly.<\/p>\n
Not both.<\/p>\n
A configuration file showed the selection logic.<\/p>\n
If Holt Ridge transferred control of Parcel Seven before January fourth:<\/p>\n
Release Brooke file.<\/p>\n
If not:<\/p>\n
Release Miranda file.<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe was making my parents choose.\u201d<\/p>\n
Aaron had been right.<\/p>\n
Ward expected them to pressure me to surrender the property to protect Brooke from exposure.<\/p>\n
If I refused, he would frame me.<\/p>\n
If I complied, Brooke\u2019s crimes stayed buried.<\/p>\n
Family leverage.<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
Except the entire mechanism no longer mattered.<\/p>\n
Brooke\u2019s crimes were already known.<\/p>\n
The Miranda package had been disproved.<\/p>\n
Ward\u2019s choice had expired before it arrived.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy tell me I hadn't stopped it?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Mercer understood.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause he doesn't know we found this partition.\u201d<\/p>\n
For once, Ward lacked information.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
Mercer returned to the interview room.<\/p>\n
He placed printed copies of both complaints on the table.<\/p>\n
Ward\u2019s face changed.<\/p>\n
Not dramatically.<\/p>\n
Just enough.<\/p>\n
Mercer told him the family-choice mechanism was gone.<\/p>\n
Brooke was already cooperating.<\/p>\n
My parents knew.<\/p>\n
Holt Ridge would not transfer Parcel Seven.<\/p>\n
The January fourth threat had no leverage.<\/p>\n
Ward stared at the papers.<\/p>\n
Then asked:<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Thomas choose?\u201d<\/p>\n
Mercer said, \u201cNeither.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ward frowned.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe chose the truth.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to Mercer, Ward stopped speaking after that.<\/p>\n
At four that afternoon, Dad came to Holt Ridge.<\/p>\n
He stood in my office holding two coffees.<\/p>\n
One dark roast.<\/p>\n
One tea.<\/p>\n
He finally remembered I didn't drink coffee after three.<\/p>\n
Small thing.<\/p>\n
It mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cI heard what Ward planned.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe thought we'd ask you to protect Brooke.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad looked ashamed.<\/p>\n
\u201cFive years ago, we might have.\u201d<\/p>\n
I appreciated that he didn't pretend otherwise.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe would have told Brooke she needed a lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n
I smiled faintly.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe'd have asked what you needed.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Not choosing one daughter.<\/p>\n
Allowing both to face their own lives.<\/p>\n
Dad looked toward the mountains.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour mother wants to see the house again.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMine?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe was there during the investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe says that doesn't count.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad nodded.<\/p>\n
No pressure.<\/p>\n
No wounded expression.<\/p>\n
\u201cOkay.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered too.<\/p>\n
At six, Evelyn called with another development.<\/p>\n
North Vale\u2019s cooperation had produced internal correspondence.<\/p>\n
Martin Reeves had not merely known Merton.<\/p>\n
He had received money.<\/p>\n
Consulting payments routed through Crestline.<\/p>\n
$240,000 over three years.<\/p>\n
The fraudulent loan was now unquestionably part of the conspiracy.<\/p>\n
North Vale\u2019s board offered a settlement fund.<\/p>\n
Not to buy silence.<\/p>\n
To cover Holt Ridge\u2019s direct costs from the fraudulent financing.<\/p>\n
Evelyn estimated several million.<\/p>\n
\u201cTake it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter documentation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAny confidentiality?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
For the first time, money was flowing toward repairing damage rather than hiding it.<\/p>\n
At eight-thirty, the forensic audit team sent one more note.<\/p>\n
The old Hanover email chain contained an attachment nobody had opened yet.<\/p>\n
A photograph.<\/p>\n
Taken six years earlier.<\/p>\n
The back lot of the Hanover property.<\/p>\n
In the distance, barely visible beyond trees, stood a man beside a parked car.<\/p>\n
Daniel enlarged it.<\/p>\n
Older image.<\/p>\n
Low resolution.<\/p>\n
But the face was recognizable.<\/p>\n
David Ward.<\/p>\n
Watching.<\/p>\n
Six years ago.<\/p>\n
Before he applied to Holt Ridge.<\/p>\n
Before Brooke met Aaron.<\/p>\n
Before the forged documents.<\/p>\n
Ward had been observing me from the very beginning.<\/p>\n
And the date on the photograph was two days before I signed the Hanover purchase contract.<\/p>\n
January fourth stopped feeling like a date and became a test. Every morning, Daniel\u2019s team checked for hidden automation. Every afternoon, outside cybersecurity firms repeated the search independently. Every evening, … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32559,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32601"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32644,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32601\/revisions\/32644"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/32559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}