I called Rachel before Jessica\u2019s words had fully settled.<\/p>\n
\u201cFinance Transformation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel did not react immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho runs it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not search internal contacts. We\u2019ll let the company explain.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat seems important.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA whole department could have built the model.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOr a spreadsheet template could carry a department author tag. We don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again, she slowed me down.<\/p>\n
Again, I needed it.<\/p>\n
\u201cRight.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not turn metadata into conspiracy.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were close.\u201d<\/p>\n
I walked to the window.<\/p>\n
Below me, a delivery truck double-parked and trapped two cars.<\/p>\n
Ordinary problems.<\/p>\n
I envied them.<\/p>\n
At 9:00 the next morning, Sterling formally selected Hartwell Strategy Group.<\/p>\n
Arthur made the announcement himself.<\/p>\n
Natalie Brooks would lead implementation.<\/p>\n
Her name appeared in the contract.<\/p>\n
Her minimum allocation appeared beside it.<\/p>\n
Any reduction required written approval.<\/p>\n
No substitution without Sterling\u2019s consent.<\/p>\n
The clauses were not dramatic.<\/p>\n
They were precise.<\/p>\n
That made them stronger.<\/p>\n
After the meeting, Arthur asked me to stay on.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019ve helped us get back on track.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019d like to extend your advisory engagement through vendor transition.\u201d<\/p>\n
I had expected the possibility.<\/p>\n
Still, the offer mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat scope?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRisk integration. Oversight. Independent escalation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Independent escalation.<\/p>\n
I smiled slightly.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou want me to be the person who says something when everyone else wants the meeting to end.\u201d<\/p>\n
Arthur smiled back.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou seem qualified.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat duration?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSix months initially.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRate?\u201d<\/p>\n
He named it.<\/p>\n
Still more than my former monthly compensation.<\/p>\n
I did not accept immediately.<\/p>\n
Not because I wanted to negotiate.<\/p>\n
Because I had learned something about immediate yeses.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019ll review it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
No pressure.<\/p>\n
No loyalty speech.<\/p>\n
No reminder of what Sterling had done for me.<\/p>\n
Just a contract.<\/p>\n
I liked that.<\/p>\n
At noon, Rachel received the formal severance confirmation.<\/p>\n
Six months\u2019 salary.<\/p>\n
Forty-thousand-dollar retention payment.<\/p>\n
Accrued vacation.<\/p>\n
Benefits extension.<\/p>\n
Written performance statement.<\/p>\n
No release.<\/p>\n
No confidentiality beyond existing obligations.<\/p>\n
No non-disparagement requirement.<\/p>\n
I read it carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re smiling,\u201d Rachel said.<\/p>\n
\u201cA little.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMoney?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe letter.\u201d<\/p>\n
The performance statement was simple.<\/p>\n
Chloe Bennett\u2019s employment ended as part of a management decision unrelated to performance or misconduct. Her performance was strong, and she made significant contributions to the Sterling pursuit.<\/p>\n
For once, the record matched reality.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want one change.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel raised an eyebrow.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRemove \u2018part of a management decision.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt makes it sound like ordinary restructuring.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you want?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmployment ended following a management decision that the company subsequently determined did not meet internal standards.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel stared at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s aggressive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s accurate according to Helen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen ask.\u201d<\/p>\n
She did.<\/p>\n
The company accepted within an hour.<\/p>\n
That surprised both of us.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey\u2019re cleaning the record,\u201d Rachel said.<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then the outside investigator asked for another meeting.<\/p>\n
This time, I groaned.<\/p>\n
Rachel laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou wanted the truth documented.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn\u2019t realize truth came with this many calendar invites.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa joined at three.<\/p>\n
She had two company lawyers with her.<\/p>\n
Helen was not present.<\/p>\n
That immediately made me cautious.<\/p>\n
Marissa began.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re investigating the origin of a staffing analysis sometimes referred to as the Sterling Margin Reset.\u201d<\/p>\n
I said nothing.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou have heard that term?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHelen asked about margin reset earlier. Jessica later told me there was a spreadsheet with that title.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat else did Jessica tell you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat my name appears with the phrase replace after award.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have the document.\u201d<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe file was created by a finance transformation analyst named Eric Nolan.\u201d<\/p>\n
I did not know him.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas he acting alone?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That one word changed the atmosphere.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho asked him to build it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa looked down.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re still reconstructing the process.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel said, \u201cThen why are we here?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Chloe appears in communications preceding the model.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat communications?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmails discussing senior staffing cost.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn't included.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen how do I appear?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour compensation data and projected utilization were used.\u201d<\/p>\n
That did not surprise me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you need from me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cContext.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa opened a document.<\/p>\n
\u201cWere you aware the firm calculated your projected cost to Sterling at approximately three hundred eighty thousand dollars in year one?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWere you aware Jessica Cole\u2019s comparable projected cost was approximately one hundred forty thousand?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The difference was larger than I expected.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Marcus ever discuss the profitability impact of retaining you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Victor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid anyone in Finance?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cWere you aware that the original proposal\u2019s margin fell below the firm\u2019s target if your initial allocation remained unchanged?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
The economic motive in numbers.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow far below?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel interrupted.<\/p>\n
\u201cChloe doesn\u2019t need to know unless relevant to her questions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa agreed.<\/p>\n
\u201cFair.\u201d<\/p>\n
She turned a page.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you recall a June conversation where Marcus asked whether Jessica could serve as day-to-day lead?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEventually, maybe. Not then.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he tell you why he was asking?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said leadership development.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything about margin?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything about pricing?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Marcus had said the client price depended on reducing your role, what would you have done?\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought about it.<\/p>\n
\u201cSuggested pricing the work honestly.\u201d<\/p>\n
One of the lawyers looked down.<\/p>\n
Marissa did not.<\/p>\n
\u201cWould you have accepted a reduced role?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised them.<\/p>\n
\u201cExplain.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn\u2019t insisting on being involved because I needed my name on everything.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why resist?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Arthur was being told I would stay.\u201d<\/p>\n
I leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf the firm wanted to reduce me and told Sterling that openly, that\u2019s a commercial discussion. The problem is saying one thing while planning another.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa wrote that down.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat if Sterling refused?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen the deal economics might not work.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen you don\u2019t take the deal.\u201d<\/p>\n
One lawyer looked at me as though I had said something naive.<\/p>\n
Maybe I had.<\/p>\n
But bad economics did not become good economics because you hid them until signing.<\/p>\n
Marissa asked, \u201cDid Marcus ever say the firm needed the Sterling win for strategic reasons?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow often?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConstantly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat reasons?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMarket positioning. Revenue. Reputation. Cross-selling.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he ever mention partner compensation?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPromotion?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHis?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot directly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you understand?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat Sterling was important to him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause he behaved like it was.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer almost made her smile.<\/p>\n
Then she asked the question that revealed why Finance Transformation mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you know a person named Allison Price?\u201d<\/p>\n
I searched my memory.<\/p>\n
\u201cFinance partner?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019ve met her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cQuarterly review meetings.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she ever discuss Sterling with you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOnce.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cJune.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she ask?\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked whether Sterling really needed senior leadership at the level proposed.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa\u2019s pen moved.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she challenge you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked whether the client was buying expertise or a person.\u201d<\/p>\n
The phrase came back.<\/p>\n
I remembered feeling annoyed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBoth, in practice.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Arthur trusted specific people.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you name yourself?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Something stirred in my memory.<\/p>\n
Not exact words.<\/p>\n
A tone.<\/p>\n
A half-smile.<\/p>\n
\u201cSomething like, \u2018You\u2019re an expensive security blanket.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
Marissa stopped writing.<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you sure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s specific.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI remember because it irritated me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat if they wanted to replace me, they should tell Arthur.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
All three people on the company side looked up.<\/p>\n
Marissa asked, \u201cYou said that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened next?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAllison laughed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said nobody was replacing anyone.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Marcus attend?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe changed the subject.\u201d<\/p>\n
The interview slowed.<\/p>\n
Marissa asked when.<\/p>\n
Where.<\/p>\n
Who else.<\/p>\n
I gave every detail I could remember.<\/p>\n
Quarterly pursuit review.<\/p>\n
June twenty-sixth, maybe.<\/p>\n
Conference room eight.<\/p>\n
Marcus.<\/p>\n
Allison.<\/p>\n
Me.<\/p>\n
Two finance analysts whose names I couldn't remember.<\/p>\n
Marissa said they would check the calendar.<\/p>\n
Then she asked, \u201cDid Allison ever tell you the model was being changed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she tell you your allocation would drop?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she mention Jessica?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she explain why she called you expensive?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOnly in relation to margin.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel leaned back.<\/p>\n
The picture had widened again.<\/p>\n
Not simply Marcus complaining about cost.<\/p>\n
Finance leadership had directly questioned whether Sterling needed me.<\/p>\n
I had directly answered that replacing me required telling the client.<\/p>\n
And Marcus had been in the room.<\/p>\n
If the calendar corroborated it, the company could no longer claim he was unaware I would object.<\/p>\n
Marissa closed her file.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe may need you again.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI assumed.\u201d<\/p>\n
After the call, Rachel said nothing for a while.<\/p>\n
I broke the silence.<\/p>\n
\u201cAllison Price.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFinance Transformation reports to her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLikely.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought Marcus created the plan.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe may have created part of it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut not all.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at my notebook copy.<\/p>\n
The story had changed.<\/p>\n
Marcus still made the decision to fire me.<\/p>\n
He still lied by omission to Sterling.<\/p>\n
He still tried to use Jessica.<\/p>\n
He still offered me money to repair the damage.<\/p>\n
But the economic structure underneath his decision might have been larger than him.<\/p>\n
That did not excuse him.<\/p>\n
It made the system worse.<\/p>\n
At 5:40, Helen called.<\/p>\n
Her face appeared unusually tense.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m calling before rumors start.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sentence is becoming familiar.\u201d<\/p>\n
She didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe board has placed Allison Price on administrative leave.\u201d<\/p>\n
I sat up.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause of Sterling?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause of issues under review.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about Victor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe has resigned from his leadership positions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Not fired.<\/p>\n
Resigned.<\/p>\n
\u201cEffective immediately?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIs he leaving the firm?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNegotiations are ongoing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Meaning lawyers.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is the company telling employees?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat the board is conducting a governance review.\u201d<\/p>\n
Governance.<\/p>\n
The word confirmed the scale.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about clients?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOnly those affected will be contacted.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAffected how?\u201d<\/p>\n
Helen paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are reviewing whether staffing representations on several major pursuits were consistent with delivery plans.\u201d<\/p>\n
Several.<\/p>\n
There it was again.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes Sterling know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought of Arthur.<\/p>\n
He had predicted judgment problem.<\/p>\n
Maybe he had underestimated it.<\/p>\n
Helen continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cChloe, I also want to apologize.\u201d<\/p>\n
I said nothing.<\/p>\n
Not regret.<\/p>\n
Not acknowledge.<\/p>\n
Apologize.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor the company\u2019s treatment of you.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her voice remained controlled, but not corporate.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were put in an impossible position. You were not given truthful information about decisions affecting your work, and then you were terminated at a moment that exposed you professionally.\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt something in my chest loosen.<\/p>\n
Not because I needed her validation.<\/p>\n
Because someone with authority had finally named it without euphemism.<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI should have looked more closely sooner.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou didn\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew Marcus was difficult.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s different.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes leadership uses that distinction too comfortably.\u201d<\/p>\n
I had no answer.<\/p>\n
Then Helen said, \u201cThe board wants to speak with you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause they are considering broader corrective action.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat kind?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGovernance, compensation, client remediation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd they want my opinion?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey want your experience.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Rachel.<\/p>\n
She nodded slowly.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTomorrow.\u201d<\/p>\n
After the call, Rachel asked, \u201cDo you want to do it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause if this happened elsewhere, someone needs to explain how it looked from below.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel nodded.<\/p>\n
That evening, Sterling sent the extension agreement.<\/p>\n
Six months.<\/p>\n
Defined scope.<\/p>\n
Independent authority.<\/p>\n
Clear reporting line to Arthur and Elena.<\/p>\n
I signed it.<\/p>\n
No hesitation this time.<\/p>\n
At 8:03, a final email arrived from Marissa.<\/p>\n
She had located the calendar invitation for the June finance meeting.<\/p>\n
The attendee list matched my memory.<\/p>\n
Marcus Hale.<\/p>\n
Allison Price.<\/p>\n
Chloe Bennett.<\/p>\n
Two analysts.<\/p>\n
And the subject line made my skin go cold.<\/p>\n
Sterling Post-Award Margin Reset.<\/p>\n
Not proposal economics.<\/p>\n
Not staffing efficiency.<\/p>\n
Post-award.<\/p>\n
The reset had been planned before Sterling ever awarded anything.<\/p>\n
I stared at the date.<\/p>\n
June 26.<\/p>\n
Three days before Marcus again told Arthur I would remain through phase one.<\/p>\n
The sequence was no longer ambiguous.<\/p>\n
The company had discussed reducing my cost after award.<\/p>\n
I had warned them Sterling would notice.<\/p>\n
Then Marcus promised Sterling I would stay.<\/p>\n
Three weeks later, he began formal succession planning.<\/p>\n
And just before the final meeting, he fired me.<\/p>\n
For the first time, I understood why the board wanted to hear from me.<\/p>\n
They were no longer trying to determine whether one manager made a bad decision.<\/p>\n
They were trying to determine how many people had known the promise and the plan were different.<\/p>\n
I called Rachel before Jessica\u2019s words had fully settled. \u201cFinance Transformation.\u201d Rachel did not react immediately. \u201cWho runs it?\u201d \u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d \u201cDo not search internal contacts. We\u2019ll let the … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30115,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30131"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30166,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30131\/revisions\/30166"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/30115"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}