Dad\u2019s sworn statement was eighty-three pages long.<\/p>\n
I read every page.<\/p>\n
Not in one sitting.<\/p>\n
I tried.<\/p>\n
By page twenty-six, the dates, names, shell companies, trusts, warnings, loans, and conversations began folding into one another until I realized I was doing exactly what Dad had always warned clients not to do.<\/p>\n
Reading for a conclusion instead of reading for facts.<\/p>\n
So I stopped.<\/p>\n
Made tea.<\/p>\n
Slept.<\/p>\n
Started again the next morning with a yellow legal pad.<\/p>\n
Dad would have approved.<\/p>\n
His statement was different from the recordings.<\/p>\n
Less emotional.<\/p>\n
More disciplined.<\/p>\n
Every factual assertion sat beside a date, document, witness, or explanation of uncertainty.<\/p>\n
When he did not know something, he wrote:<\/p>\n
I cannot independently confirm this.<\/p>\n
When he suspected something, he wrote:<\/p>\n
This inference should not be treated as established fact.<\/p>\n
I smiled the first time I saw that sentence.<\/p>\n
That was Dad refusing to become Richard even while investigating him.<\/p>\n
Richard worked by blurring what was known and what people feared.<\/p>\n
Dad separated them.<\/p>\n
The statement also resolved something that had bothered me.<\/p>\n
Why had Dad waited so long to tell me?<\/p>\n
His answer was not flattering.<\/p>\n
To himself.<\/p>\n
Or me.<\/p>\n
He believed Richard\u2019s financial system might collapse if confronted badly.<\/p>\n
If he told me too early, he feared I would confront Mark emotionally.<\/p>\n
Mark would warn Richard.<\/p>\n
Richard would destroy records.<\/p>\n
People could lose access to recoverable money.<\/p>\n
So Dad chose investigation over disclosure.<\/p>\n
He admitted that choice hurt me.<\/p>\n
He admitted he knew it might.<\/p>\n
He made it anyway.<\/p>\n
Reading that did not make me angry again.<\/p>\n
It made me understand the difference between explanation and absolution.<\/p>\n
Dad had a reason.<\/p>\n
The reason did not erase the cost.<\/p>\n
Just like Mark.<\/p>\n
Just like Denise.<\/p>\n
Just like Arthur.<\/p>\n
The statement included a section labeled:<\/p>\n
MARK BENNETT.<\/p>\n
I stopped before reading it.<\/p>\n
Then continued.<\/p>\n
Dad described Mark as financially ambitious, conflict-avoidant, eager for approval, and initially more naive than corrupt.<\/p>\n
That language surprised me.<\/p>\n
Initially.<\/p>\n
Dad documented three separate occasions when Mark pushed back against Richard.<\/p>\n
The first involved my house.<\/p>\n
The second involved my inheritance.<\/p>\n
The third involved falsified vendor expenses.<\/p>\n
Each time Mark objected.<\/p>\n
Each time Richard reduced the request.<\/p>\n
Changed the wording.<\/p>\n
Delayed.<\/p>\n
Returned later.<\/p>\n
Dad wrote:<\/p>\n
Mr. Vale appears to understand that Mr. Bennett resists large ethical breaches but can be induced to accept smaller ones framed as temporary corrective actions.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
That was Mark\u2019s entire descent in one sentence.<\/p>\n
Richard did not ask him to become dishonest all at once.<\/p>\n
He taught him to survive one temporary compromise at a time.<\/p>\n
Then Dad wrote something I had not expected.<\/p>\n
This does not remove Mr. Bennett\u2019s responsibility. Repeated manipulation does not cancel repeated choice.<\/p>\n
I underlined it.<\/p>\n
That was the sentence I needed when people asked whether Mark was victim or perpetrator.<\/p>\n
Both.<\/p>\n
Not equally.<\/p>\n
Not simply.<\/p>\n
Richard manipulated him.<\/p>\n
Mark harmed me.<\/p>\n
Both true.<\/p>\n
The statement described me too.<\/p>\n
Not personally at first.<\/p>\n
Financially.<\/p>\n
Claire Bennett maintains separate assets, strong credit, established charitable giving, and no operational role in Northstar.<\/p>\n
Dad had already identified why Richard would select me as a future paper participant.<\/p>\n
Clean financial history.<\/p>\n
No business knowledge.<\/p>\n
Independent property.<\/p>\n
Marriage to the public owner.<\/p>\n
Perfect.<\/p>\n
Then Dad added:<\/p>\n
My concern is that Claire\u2019s trust in her husband may be treated as an authentication mechanism.<\/p>\n
I put the page down.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Years before Christmas.<\/p>\n
Authentication mechanism.<\/p>\n
Not wife.<\/p>\n
Not partner.<\/p>\n
A person whose trust could be converted into signature authority.<\/p>\n
That was exactly what Richard had tried.<\/p>\n
And what Mark eventually allowed.<\/p>\n
The sworn statement also resolved Victor Raines.<\/p>\n
Dad did not believe Richard caused Victor\u2019s stroke.<\/p>\n
He wrote that Victor had significant documented medical risk.<\/p>\n
However, Dad believed Richard exploited the incapacity afterward by using detached signature pages and disputed authorizations.<\/p>\n
Same method.<\/p>\n
No invented murder needed.<\/p>\n
Richard had enough real crimes.<\/p>\n
The statement ended with recommendations.<\/p>\n
Freeze related-party lending if evidence established concealment.<\/p>\n
Protect investor reserve.<\/p>\n
Interview Mark separately from Richard.<\/p>\n
Audit Cedar Lane.<\/p>\n
Confirm whether police contact Carl Mercer had unauthorized relationships with Vale entities.<\/p>\n
Preserve Claire\u2019s identity records.<\/p>\n
And:<\/p>\n
Do not inform Richard Vale of all evidence sources simultaneously.<\/p>\n
Dad had been designing the investigation before he died.<\/p>\n
Evelyn Markham explained that regulators received the statement, but the financial case moved slowly because Dad died before handing over some original documentation.<\/p>\n
Then internal concerns about Mercer complicated referral.<\/p>\n
By the time regulators rebuilt enough context, Richard had already moved parts of the structure.<\/p>\n
\u201cCould you have stopped him sooner?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Evelyn did not become defensive.<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
That honesty mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat went wrong?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe treated Thomas as our central witness.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOne point of failure.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDad would hate that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Apparently he had warned them.<\/p>\n
They believed formal systems could protect the investigation.<\/p>\n
Then Dad died.<\/p>\n
Records became harder to authenticate.<\/p>\n
Witnesses became frightened.<\/p>\n
Mercer\u2019s interference distorted internal confidence.<\/p>\n
No one intentionally abandoned the case.<\/p>\n
It simply slowed.<\/p>\n
And Richard survived inside the delay.<\/p>\n
That frightened me more than conspiracy.<\/p>\n
Sometimes wrongdoing wins time not because every institution is corrupt but because institutions are human.<\/p>\n
People miss things.<\/p>\n
Delay things.<\/p>\n
Assume someone else verified things.<\/p>\n
Richard understood delay.<\/p>\n
He built around it.<\/p>\n
Two months after the hearing, Mark\u2019s sentencing date arrived.<\/p>\n
By then my divorce had become final.<\/p>\n
No ceremony.<\/p>\n
No courtroom confrontation.<\/p>\n
Margaret called.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s entered.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s it.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stood in my kitchen looking at nothing.<\/p>\n
Six years of marriage ended through an electronic filing and one sentence from my attorney.<\/p>\n
I expected grief.<\/p>\n
It came later.<\/p>\n
First came relief.<\/p>\n
Then guilt about relief.<\/p>\n
Then annoyance at the guilt.<\/p>\n
Emotions refuse sequence.<\/p>\n
The house was legally mine subject to Dad\u2019s trust.<\/p>\n
Mark waived any disputed claim.<\/p>\n
Our joint checking account had been divided.<\/p>\n
Northstar-related liabilities remained with him or under litigation.<\/p>\n
My inheritance stayed separate.<\/p>\n
The reserve moved toward professional fiduciary administration.<\/p>\n
Commonwealth appointed an independent corporate trustee with court oversight.<\/p>\n
I formally declined successor control after a temporary transition.<\/p>\n
Nine-point-something million dollars stopped being my problem.<\/p>\n
I celebrated by buying groceries.<\/p>\n
Ordinary ones.<\/p>\n
Bread.<\/p>\n
Apples.<\/p>\n
Coffee.<\/p>\n
Mustard.<\/p>\n
Evan came over and looked inside the refrigerator.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is progress.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGo away.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is actual food.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMiracles continue.\u201d<\/p>\n
We laughed.<\/p>\n
Then sentencing week arrived.<\/p>\n
Sophie asked whether I would attend.<\/p>\n
\u201cI haven\u2019t decided.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDad wants you there.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat makes me less likely.\u201d<\/p>\n
She winced.<\/p>\n
\u201cSorry.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo, it\u2019s okay.\u201d<\/p>\n
She was still learning that she did not need to negotiate everyone into one room.<\/p>\n
Eventually I chose to go.<\/p>\n
Not for Mark.<\/p>\n
Not against him.<\/p>\n
For myself.<\/p>\n
I wanted to hear the official record of what he had done and what he had admitted.<\/p>\n
No family summary.<\/p>\n
No news interpretation.<\/p>\n
No whispered version.<\/p>\n
Evidence.<\/p>\n
The prosecutor described Mark\u2019s conduct carefully.<\/p>\n
He knowingly accessed my financial information without authorization.<\/p>\n
Knowingly forwarded communications addressed to me.<\/p>\n
Participated in a plan to pressure me into signing financial documents.<\/p>\n
Misrepresented my behavior to Denise.<\/p>\n
Allowed Richard access to personal data.<\/p>\n
Signed business representations he knew were incomplete or misleading.<\/p>\n
He did not know about Dad\u2019s poisoning.<\/p>\n
Did not know the full reserve theft plan.<\/p>\n
Did not personally forge my signature.<\/p>\n
Did not personally receive the planned advisory fee.<\/p>\n
Those facts were also stated.<\/p>\n
Mark\u2019s cooperation was extensive.<\/p>\n
The prosecutor said it materially helped expose Richard\u2019s hidden entities and prevent additional losses.<\/p>\n
The judge asked Mark whether he wished to speak.<\/p>\n
He stood.<\/p>\n
For several seconds, he said nothing.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
\u201cI spent years telling myself I was trapped.\u201d<\/p>\n
My throat tightened.<\/p>\n
He continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was pressured. I was lied to. I was manipulated. All of that is true.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s attorneys would have loved the beginning.<\/p>\n
Then Mark said:<\/p>\n
\u201cBut being manipulated does not explain every choice I made after I knew better.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Sophie.<\/p>\n
She was crying quietly.<\/p>\n
Mark continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI had moments when I could have told Claire.\u201d<\/p>\n
Pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cI chose not to.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI had documents addressed to her.\u201d<\/p>\n
Pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cI gave them to Richard.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew she trusted me to explain our finances honestly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cI used that trust.\u201d<\/p>\n
No excuses.<\/p>\n
The judge listened.<\/p>\n
Mark looked toward me then.<\/p>\n
Not dramatically.<\/p>\n
Just once.<\/p>\n
\u201cI am sorry.\u201d<\/p>\n
He did not ask me to forgive him.<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
Then he looked at Sophie and Evan.<\/p>\n
\u201cI taught both of you that adults should own what they do.\u201d<\/p>\n
His voice broke.<\/p>\n
\u201cI failed my own lesson.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evan looked down.<\/p>\n
Sophie covered her mouth.<\/p>\n
Mark finished:<\/p>\n
\u201cI hope what I do after this matters. I understand it does not change what I did before.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then he sat.<\/p>\n
The judge imposed a custodial sentence.<\/p>\n
Not the maximum.<\/p>\n
Not probation.<\/p>\n
Years.<\/p>\n
Followed by supervision.<\/p>\n
Financial restrictions.<\/p>\n
Restitution obligations.<\/p>\n
I will not pretend I remember every number from that moment.<\/p>\n
I remember Sophie\u2019s hand finding mine.<\/p>\n
I remember Evan staring straight ahead.<\/p>\n
I remember Denise closing her eyes.<\/p>\n
I remember Mark nodding once as if he had expected exactly that.<\/p>\n
Afterward, reporters gathered outside.<\/p>\n
We avoided them.<\/p>\n
In the parking structure, Sophie stopped walking.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m angry that he\u2019s going.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m angry he deserves to go.\u201d<\/p>\n
I pulled her close.<\/p>\n
\u201cBoth are allowed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat if I still love him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou should.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cShould?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s your father.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn\u2019t mean I have to.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I corrected myself.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re allowed to.\u201d<\/p>\n
Better.<\/p>\n
She leaned against me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo I love him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought.<\/p>\n
Some questions deserve precision.<\/p>\n
\u201cI love who he was in parts of my life.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sophie waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s different from wanting him back.\u201d<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you forgive him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome days.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised her.<\/p>\n
\u201cForgiveness can change by day?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad had said forgiveness did not equal renewed access.<\/p>\n
He had not said forgiveness was a switch.<\/p>\n
Mine came and went.<\/p>\n
Some mornings I remembered Mark lying about Christmas and felt nothing but distance.<\/p>\n
Other times I remembered him sitting beside me during Dad\u2019s first hospitalization, holding my coat and bringing terrible vending-machine coffee.<\/p>\n
Both memories belonged to the same person.<\/p>\n
Forgiveness did not require choosing one as the real Mark.<\/p>\n
People contain their contradictions.<\/p>\n
Accountability does too.<\/p>\n
On the drive home, Evan asked whether he could visit Mark.<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould that hurt you?\u201d<\/p>\n
The question broke my heart a little.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou sure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou won\u2019t think I\u2019m choosing him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNever.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad\u2019s letter.<\/p>\n
Do not use Sophie or Evan to punish their father.<\/p>\n
I would not.<\/p>\n
Evan exhaled.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want him to know I\u2019m mad.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen tell him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI also want him to know I love him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTell him that too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat if those cancel each other?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey don\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
He nodded.<\/p>\n
Children should not have to simplify parents to keep loving them.<\/p>\n
Neither should adults.<\/p>\n
A week later, Richard entered a plea arrangement on federal charges.<\/p>\n
Financial conspiracy.<\/p>\n
Identity theft.<\/p>\n
Fraud.<\/p>\n
Obstruction-related conduct.<\/p>\n
Additional state proceedings covered Dad\u2019s death.<\/p>\n
His admission regarding Dad remained carefully negotiated.<\/p>\n
He acknowledged directing the medication substitution and leaving after Dad requested emergency care.<\/p>\n
The legal language was sterile.<\/p>\n
The fact was not.<\/p>\n
Richard had finally signed his own name beneath conduct he could no longer place on someone else.<\/p>\n
Peter pleaded separately.<\/p>\n
Pierce too.<\/p>\n
Linda\u2019s cooperation reduced her exposure but did not erase it.<\/p>\n
Mercer faced charges connected to corruption, unauthorized access, and evidence interference.<\/p>\n
Arthur\u2019s cooperation mattered, but so did his years of concealment.<\/p>\n
Cynthia reached an agreement requiring testimony and accountability for her earlier bookkeeping acts.<\/p>\n
Graham received substantial consideration for preserving records and refusing final certification.<\/p>\n
Denise was not charged with the larger fraud conspiracy.<\/p>\n
Her paid surveillance and false affidavit still had legal consequences, but prosecutors credited her later cooperation and evidence.<\/p>\n
Life did not sort them into clean boxes.<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
Bad.<\/p>\n
Victim.<\/p>\n
Offender.<\/p>\n
Some belonged partly in several.<\/p>\n
Only Richard remained simple in one important way.<\/p>\n
He had understood the harm early.<\/p>\n
Designed it deliberately.<\/p>\n
Expanded it repeatedly.<\/p>\n
And kept choosing control.<\/p>\n
I submitted a victim impact statement for Dad\u2019s case.<\/p>\n
It took me three days.<\/p>\n
Then I deleted almost all of it.<\/p>\n
The first draft was anger.<\/p>\n
The second was biography.<\/p>\n
The third tried to explain Dad as if the court needed to know his favorite soup.<\/p>\n
Eventually I wrote:<\/p>\n
Thomas Bennett was not valuable because he was perfect. He was valuable because he remained capable of changing his judgment when evidence changed.<\/p>\n
I kept that.<\/p>\n
I wrote that Dad had been a father, lawyer, friend, trustee, and stubborn critic.<\/p>\n
I wrote that his death affected more than one family because his work protected people who never knew his name.<\/p>\n
Then I wrote:<\/p>\n
Richard Vale did not only take away years my father might have lived. He forced everyone who loved him to spend years wondering whether his death was natural, whether his warnings mattered, and whether our own memories could be trusted.<\/p>\n
That was the harm I understood most.<\/p>\n
Richard converted grief into uncertainty.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
I do not ask the court to punish Mr. Vale for everything that went wrong in our lives. I ask only that his sentence reflect what the evidence proves he chose.<\/p>\n
Dad would have approved.<\/p>\n
No enlargement.<\/p>\n
No minimization.<\/p>\n
Truth enough.<\/p>\n
I submitted it.<\/p>\n
Never revised again.<\/p>\n
Months passed.<\/p>\n
Harbor House invited me to a spring fundraiser.<\/p>\n
I almost declined because Elena said media might attend.<\/p>\n
Then Ruth called.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you make me stand on a stage alone after everything you\u2019ve caused, I will haunt you while alive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re already doing that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood. Seven p.m.\u201d<\/p>\n
I went.<\/p>\n
No speech about surviving betrayal.<\/p>\n
No dramatic story.<\/p>\n
We raised money for housing.<\/p>\n
A former shelter resident spoke about getting an apartment.<\/p>\n
A child played piano badly.<\/p>\n
Ruth cried.<\/p>\n
I cried because Ruth cried.<\/p>\n
Afterward Elena found me near the coat check.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you ever think about the fact that none of this would have surfaced if that pipe didn\u2019t burst?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you make of that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPlumbing is powerful.\u201d<\/p>\n
She laughed.<\/p>\n
Then became serious.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you think it saved you?\u201d<\/p>\n
I considered it.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cQuestions.\u201d<\/p>\n
She waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cI finally asked questions when answers stopped fitting.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was truer.<\/p>\n
The pipe created circumstances.<\/p>\n
The news created visibility.<\/p>\n
But what broke Richard\u2019s system was comparison.<\/p>\n
Sophie compared Mark\u2019s story with mine.<\/p>\n
Ruth compared donations with records.<\/p>\n
Daniel compared transactions.<\/p>\n
Dad compared public ownership with actual control.<\/p>\n
Graham compared books.<\/p>\n
Cynthia compared what Richard said with what he did.<\/p>\n
Every lie survived only while people held separate pieces.<\/p>\n
That was why Richard isolated them.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s the story,\u201d I told Elena.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot Christmas?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot betrayal?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThose too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCompare notes.\u201d<\/p>\n
She smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cThomas Bennett\u2019s daughter.\u201d<\/p>\n
I rolled my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then my phone buzzed.<\/p>\n
A message from Sophie.<\/p>\n
Dinner tomorrow?<\/p>\n
Mom, Evan, Jeremy maybe.<\/p>\n
I stared at the word Mom.<\/p>\n
She had never called me that casually before.<\/p>\n
Maybe she did not mean it as a title.<\/p>\n
Maybe autocorrect.<\/p>\n
Maybe intentional.<\/p>\n
I did not ask.<\/p>\n
I replied:<\/p>\n
Yes. 6:30. Bring dessert.<\/p>\n
She wrote:<\/p>\n
Bossy.<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
Dad would have approved that too.<\/p>\n
Dad\u2019s sworn statement was eighty-three pages long. I read every page. Not in one sitting. I tried. By page twenty-six, the dates, names, shell companies, trusts, warnings, loans, and conversations … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25208,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25276,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25241\/revisions\/25276"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/25208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}