Three weeks after Christmas, I stood outside a federal courtroom holding coffee I had forgotten to drink.<\/p>\n
The holidays were over.<\/p>\n
Storefront decorations had disappeared.<\/p>\n
Children had returned to school.<\/p>\n
People complained about January weather and credit-card bills as though Christmas had ended normally.<\/p>\n
Mine seemed unwilling to finish.<\/p>\n
Margaret stood beside me reading a message from one of the prosecutors. She wore the expression I had learned meant something inconvenient had happened but no one was dead.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard\u2019s defense filed a supplemental motion.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was unsurprising.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat version of me this time?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe version where you and Mark were secretly working together.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s ambitious.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s also predictable.\u201d<\/p>\n
The defense wanted restrictions placed on several financial records prosecutors had seized from Vale Strategic and Northstar.<\/p>\n
Their argument was that some records reflected privileged business communications and that investigators had misinterpreted transfers because Mark and I had allegedly participated in a private marital investment arrangement.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhich investment arrangement?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one Richard\u2019s lawyers are constructing from the forged paperwork.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
Richard had spent months creating documents that could make me appear guilty.<\/p>\n
Now that the documents had failed as leverage, his lawyers were using them exactly as he intended.<\/p>\n
Not proof.<\/p>\n
Confusion.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo they actually say I committed fraud?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause accusing you directly would create problems if they know the documents are forged. They\u2019re suggesting investigators haven\u2019t established who knew what.\u201d<\/p>\n
A fog instead of an accusation.<\/p>\n
That was smarter.<\/p>\n
Richard had always preferred uncertainty when certainty worked against him.<\/p>\n
Mark arrived twenty minutes later with his attorney.<\/p>\n
He stopped when he saw me.<\/p>\n
We had not spoken since the interview suite.<\/p>\n
He looked thinner.<\/p>\n
Not dramatically.<\/p>\n
Just enough that his suit no longer sat correctly across his shoulders.<\/p>\n
He did not approach.<\/p>\n
I appreciated that.<\/p>\n
Sophie had told me he was staying in a rented apartment while the divorce proceeded. The marital house\u2014my house legally, though I was beginning to dislike defining it through possession\u2014remained under preservation orders until investigators finished documenting Mark\u2019s office.<\/p>\n
I had stayed mostly at Dad\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Not because I was afraid to go home.<\/p>\n
Because I had not yet decided what home meant.<\/p>\n
The hearing began at nine.<\/p>\n
Richard entered through a side door.<\/p>\n
For the first time I saw him in a courtroom rather than an interview room.<\/p>\n
He had changed back into a suit.<\/p>\n
No tie pin.<\/p>\n
No expensive watch.<\/p>\n
Still, the transformation irritated me.<\/p>\n
Clothing returned some of the authority detention had stripped away.<\/p>\n
Then he saw me.<\/p>\n
Only for a second.<\/p>\n
His expression barely changed.<\/p>\n
That was enough.<\/p>\n
He had expected me.<\/p>\n
I sat behind prosecutors with Margaret.<\/p>\n
Mark sat several rows away.<\/p>\n
The hearing itself began with arguments about records, warrants, privilege filters, and preservation procedures.<\/p>\n
Nothing dramatic.<\/p>\n
Nothing like television.<\/p>\n
Lawyers spoke in careful sentences.<\/p>\n
The judge interrupted frequently.<\/p>\n
People waited while pages were located.<\/p>\n
Then Richard\u2019s attorney turned toward the supposed marital investment arrangement.<\/p>\n
He described six transfers.<\/p>\n
Documents carrying my signature.<\/p>\n
Emails involving Mark.<\/p>\n
A proposed advisory agreement.<\/p>\n
Trust communications forwarded through our home.<\/p>\n
He never said the documents were genuine.<\/p>\n
He simply arranged them close enough together that a careless listener could infer a shared plan.<\/p>\n
I understood immediately why Richard liked paperwork.<\/p>\n
Paper does not raise its voice when someone lies about it.<\/p>\n
Margaret wrote something on her legal pad and pushed it toward me.<\/p>\n
LET THEM FINISH.<\/p>\n
I nodded.<\/p>\n
The defense attorney continued.<\/p>\n
He suggested Mark\u2019s later cooperation might be motivated by a desire to shift responsibility to Richard after \u201ca private investment strategy between spouses became subject to scrutiny.\u201d<\/p>\n
Private investment strategy.<\/p>\n
I nearly admired the phrase.<\/p>\n
Almost.<\/p>\n
Then the prosecutor stood.<\/p>\n
She began with the condominium signature page.<\/p>\n
Original.<\/p>\n
Authenticated.<\/p>\n
Dated two years earlier.<\/p>\n
Then she displayed the supposed Cedar Lane authorization.<\/p>\n
Same signature.<\/p>\n
Same microscopic ink break.<\/p>\n
Same alignment.<\/p>\n
Copied.<\/p>\n
The defense objected to conclusions before expert testimony.<\/p>\n
The judge allowed the government to describe its preliminary forensic findings.<\/p>\n
Next came Commonwealth Continental\u2019s identity-verification failures.<\/p>\n
Two attempts to authenticate me.<\/p>\n
One remote.<\/p>\n
One involving Linda pretending to be me.<\/p>\n
Then my employment and location records proving I was elsewhere.<\/p>\n
Then the phone-profile data.<\/p>\n
An iPhone registered to Mark.<\/p>\n
Not my Android.<\/p>\n
The fog began thinning.<\/p>\n
The prosecutor displayed Richard\u2019s recovered email:<\/p>\n
If Mark cannot deliver Claire\u2019s authorization by Christmas, use the scanned signature and certify before December 31.<\/p>\n
No interpretation needed.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s attorney argued that \u201cauthorization\u201d could refer to a legitimate expected signature.<\/p>\n
Then came Graham\u2019s preserved server backup.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
I already have what I need.<\/p>\n
Mark:<\/p>\n
I\u2019m not forging anything.<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
Simple.<\/p>\n
Ugly.<\/p>\n
Useful.<\/p>\n
Mark had agreed to manipulate me.<\/p>\n
But he had not agreed to forge my signature.<\/p>\n
Truth did not make him innocent.<\/p>\n
It made the boundaries visible.<\/p>\n
The prosecutor then addressed the advisory agreements.<\/p>\n
Two drafts.<\/p>\n
One paid Mark two million dollars.<\/p>\n
One paid me.<\/p>\n
Neither signed.<\/p>\n
Same transaction.<\/p>\n
Different future culprit.<\/p>\n
The judge looked over her glasses.<\/p>\n
\u201cCounsel, is the defense representing that either proposed agreement was executed?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s attorney paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo, Your Honor.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen be careful how you characterize them.\u201d<\/p>\n
Margaret underlined something on her pad.<\/p>\n
I did not need to read it.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s strategy had just lost room.<\/p>\n
The hearing continued.<\/p>\n
Then something unexpected happened.<\/p>\n
Mark\u2019s attorney requested permission to address a factual issue raised by the defense.<\/p>\n
The judge allowed it.<\/p>\n
Mark\u2019s attorney stated clearly that Mark denied any joint investment agreement with me and accepted responsibility for withholding financial information from me.<\/p>\n
He also acknowledged that Mark forwarded trust correspondence addressed to me.<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
Publicly admitting misconduct.<\/p>\n
No softening.<\/p>\n
Then his attorney said:<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Bennett further acknowledges that he participated in an effort to pressure his wife into signing financial documents she had not previously reviewed.\u201d<\/p>\n
The courtroom became very quiet.<\/p>\n
Richard turned toward Mark.<\/p>\n
Mark did not look at him.<\/p>\n
His attorney continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Bennett\u2019s position is not that he was innocent of wrongdoing. His position is that Mrs. Bennett was not a participant.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked down.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
Not to the marriage.<\/p>\n
That was over.<\/p>\n
But to the record.<\/p>\n
Mark was doing exactly what his note promised.<\/p>\n
Cooperating when it hurt him.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s lawyer asked whether Mark had received any promise of immunity.<\/p>\n
No.<\/p>\n
Reduced charges?<\/p>\n
No guarantee.<\/p>\n
Sentencing recommendation?<\/p>\n
No guarantee.<\/p>\n
Then why was he making admissions?<\/p>\n
Mark\u2019s attorney answered:<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause they are true.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard finally looked at me.<\/p>\n
I did not return it.<\/p>\n
The judge denied most of the defense request.<\/p>\n
A privilege-review process remained in place for legitimate attorney communications.<\/p>\n
But the financial records stayed available to investigators.<\/p>\n
Outside the courtroom, reporters waited.<\/p>\n
I had forgotten that part.<\/p>\n
The Channel Eight Christmas segment had made me recognizable enough that cameras turned immediately.<\/p>\n
Questions came from every direction.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire, did you know your husband was involved?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you cooperating with prosecutors?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Richard Vale kill your father?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you divorcing Mark?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you believe Mark should be charged?\u201d<\/p>\n
Margaret guided me toward the exit.<\/p>\n
Then I heard Elena Park.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped.<\/p>\n
She did not push a microphone into my face.<\/p>\n
That was why I trusted her more than the others.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you want to say anything?\u201d<\/p>\n
I considered it.<\/p>\n
Every public statement could become evidence, strategy, leverage.<\/p>\n
Richard had taught me that.<\/p>\n
Dad had taught me something else.<\/p>\n
Bad news early.<\/p>\n
Truth plainly.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m not discussing evidence outside court.\u201d<\/p>\n
Elena nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Mark?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe divorce is proceeding.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I started walking.<\/p>\n
Then another reporter shouted:<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you forgive him?\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped again.<\/p>\n
Margaret murmured, \u201cYou don\u2019t have to answer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
I turned.<\/p>\n
\u201cForgiveness and access are different things.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was all.<\/p>\n
I left.<\/p>\n
By afternoon, the sentence was everywhere.<\/p>\n
I regretted saying it for approximately seven minutes.<\/p>\n
Then I decided Dad would have been annoyed that someone turned his practical advice into a television quote.<\/p>\n
That made me smile.<\/p>\n
At Dad\u2019s house, Harold and Daniel were working through the reserve beneficiaries.<\/p>\n
Forty-three family groups had potential claims.<\/p>\n
Some were straightforward.<\/p>\n
Others involved estates, dissolved partnerships, divorces, deaths, and trusts nested inside trusts.<\/p>\n
The money was safe.<\/p>\n
Returning it would be slow.<\/p>\n
One beneficiary had already been located.<\/p>\n
An eighty-one-year-old woman named Ruth Raines.<\/p>\n
Victor\u2019s older sister.<\/p>\n
I knew the surname immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes she know about Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe knows enough,\u201d Harold said.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes she know about the reserve?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently Victor told her there was protected investor money, but she assumed it was distributed years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she know Dad?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
My attention sharpened.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow well?\u201d<\/p>\n
Harold handed me a note.<\/p>\n
Ruth wanted to speak with me.<\/p>\n
Not investigators first.<\/p>\n
Me.<\/p>\n
Brooks had approved contact provided it was documented.<\/p>\n
I called.<\/p>\n
Her voice was thin but steady.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire Bennett?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou sound like Thomas.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo one has ever said that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey should.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you want to tell me?\u201d<\/p>\n
She was silent for a moment.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour father saved my brother once.\u201d<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom himself.\u201d<\/p>\n
Victor Raines, she explained, had been brilliant with property and terrible with risk.<\/p>\n
He borrowed too aggressively.<\/p>\n
Moved money between developments.<\/p>\n
Believed every loss could be repaired by the next deal.<\/p>\n
Richard did not invent that behavior.<\/p>\n
He encouraged it.<\/p>\n
Dad had entered the picture because several investors were demanding safeguards.<\/p>\n
The reserve trust was Dad\u2019s solution.<\/p>\n
Money that Victor and Richard could not casually touch.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Richard was right about one thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDad helped build the structure.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruth did not hesitate.<\/p>\n
\u201cThomas helped build the cage because my brother kept trying to eat the seed.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed unexpectedly.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds like something Dad would approve of.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVictor did not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they remain friends?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor a while.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then Victor began signing blank authorizations for Richard.<\/p>\n
Dad warned him.<\/p>\n
Victor resented it.<\/p>\n
Richard told Victor that Dad was trying to control the business.<\/p>\n
Familiar.<\/p>\n
Divide people.<\/p>\n
Reframe concern as domination.<\/p>\n
Victor believed Richard.<\/p>\n
Until the money began disappearing.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Victor think Richard caused his stroke?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruth became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe had uncontrolled blood pressure for years. He smoked. He ignored doctors. Please don\u2019t turn every tragedy into Richard.\u201d<\/p>\n
The correction embarrassed me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re right.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard did enough. He doesn\u2019t need crimes added.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad could have said exactly that.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was Victor\u2019s letter?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one you found?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe called me after writing it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat he finally understood Thomas had been right.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout signatures.\u201d<\/p>\n
My skin prickled.<\/p>\n
Victor realized blank signature pages had been attached to transactions he never approved.<\/p>\n
He planned to meet Dad.<\/p>\n
Then the stroke happened.<\/p>\n
Natural timing.<\/p>\n
Terrible timing.<\/p>\n
Richard exploited the incapacity afterward.<\/p>\n
Again, absence.<\/p>\n
Not necessarily caused.<\/p>\n
Used.<\/p>\n
Ruth continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is something else Thomas never knew.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVictor met Mark.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYears ago. Before Mark married you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard brought him to Victor\u2019s rehabilitation center.\u201d<\/p>\n
Victor could speak by then but had limited mobility.<\/p>\n
Richard introduced Mark as the person who would help \u201cmodernize\u201d the property structure.<\/p>\n
Victor disliked him immediately.<\/p>\n
Despite everything, I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe thought Mark wanted Richard\u2019s approval too badly.\u201d<\/p>\n
That hurt because it was accurate.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Victor warn him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruth remembered because Victor repeated it afterward.<\/p>\n
\u201cNever sign the last page before you\u2019ve read the first.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mark apparently laughed.<\/p>\n
He thought Victor was making a joke.<\/p>\n
Years later, Mark signed detached signature pages anyway.<\/p>\n
Warnings only matter if people are willing to imagine they apply to them.<\/p>\n
Ruth asked whether Mark was in prison.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWill he be?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you want him there?\u201d<\/p>\n
Everyone kept asking me versions of that.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want the court to decide from what he actually did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruth was silent.<\/p>\n
\u201cThomas definitely raised you.\u201d<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes unfortunately.\u201d<\/p>\n
Before ending, she said:<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire, the reserve was never supposed to make anyone rich.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was supposed to make people whole.\u201d<\/p>\n
That sentence stayed with me.<\/p>\n
Make people whole.<\/p>\n
Money could not do that literally.<\/p>\n
Some investors had died.<\/p>\n
Families had fractured.<\/p>\n
Businesses failed.<\/p>\n
But the reserve could complete an obligation.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
That evening Sophie and Evan came over.<\/p>\n
Sophie had watched the hearing coverage.<\/p>\n
Evan had avoided it.<\/p>\n
Both choices seemed reasonable.<\/p>\n
\u201cDad admitted it in court,\u201d Sophie said.<\/p>\n
\u201cHis lawyer did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSame thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMostly.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sat at the kitchen table.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes that help?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWith what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought about it.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her eyes lifted.<\/p>\n
\u201cEnough to change anything?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
That answer hurt her.<\/p>\n
I could see it.<\/p>\n
But she did not argue.<\/p>\n
Evan opened the refrigerator.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is absolutely no food here.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s food.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere are condiments.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThose count.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo civilized person thinks mustard is dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad would have liked him.<\/p>\n
We ordered pizza.<\/p>\n
Halfway through dinner, Sophie\u2019s phone rang.<\/p>\n
Jeremy.<\/p>\n
She ignored it.<\/p>\n
Then it rang again.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnswer,\u201d Evan said.<\/p>\n
She glared.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat if it\u2019s important?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat if it isn\u2019t?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen hang up.\u201d<\/p>\n
She answered.<\/p>\n
Her expression changed almost immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
She stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
A pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you sure?\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cJeremy says someone broke into his apartment.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
Richard was in custody.<\/p>\n
Mercer detained.<\/p>\n
Peter protected.<\/p>\n
Linda cooperating.<\/p>\n
Still, old networks did not disappear because their center was arrested.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was taken?\u201d<\/p>\n
Sophie listened.<\/p>\n
Then her face went pale.<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s good.\u201d<\/p>\n
She shook her head.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. They left something.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
Jeremy sent a photograph.<\/p>\n
A single envelope on his kitchen table.<\/p>\n
No sign of forced entry.<\/p>\n
No writing except:<\/p>\n
FOR CLAIRE.<\/p>\n
I felt the old cold sensation return.<\/p>\n
Brooks was called immediately.<\/p>\n
Agents entered Jeremy\u2019s apartment.<\/p>\n
The envelope contained no threat.<\/p>\n
No powder.<\/p>\n
No device.<\/p>\n
One photocopied bank record.<\/p>\n
Account opened four years earlier.<\/p>\n
Holder:<\/p>\n
Claire Bennett.<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cI never opened this.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel examined the image remotely.<\/p>\n
The account held $310,000.<\/p>\n
Source deposits:<\/p>\n
Vale Strategic Partners.<\/p>\n
Then withdrawals.<\/p>\n
Recipient:<\/p>\n
Thomas Bennett.<\/p>\n
My father.<\/p>\n
The last transfer occurred six weeks before he died.<\/p>\n
For the first time since Richard\u2019s arrest, I felt the ground move.<\/p>\n
Dad had received money from an account falsely opened in my name.<\/p>\n
Not years before Richard\u2019s fraud.<\/p>\n
During it.<\/p>\n
Three hundred and ten thousand dollars.<\/p>\n
And someone still free wanted me to know.<\/p>\n
Three weeks after Christmas, I stood outside a federal courtroom holding coffee I had forgotten to drink. The holidays were over. Storefront decorations had disappeared. Children had returned to school. … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25208,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25237"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25237\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25272,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25237\/revisions\/25272"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/25208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}