Daniel stared at Nina's phone as though the screen had betrayed him personally.<\/p>\n
Martin Shaw extended his hand.<\/p>\n
\u201cMay I see that?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina forwarded the document instead.<\/p>\n
Martin read silently.<\/p>\n
The muscles along his jaw tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel, did you disclose this to me?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel said nothing.<\/p>\n
That was answer enough.<\/p>\n
I sat back down.<\/p>\n
The wedding ring remained on the table between us.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow long had the retention agreement existed?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt's standard.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat wasn't my question.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWestbridge wanted management continuity.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou already said that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey offered incentives.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSix million dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOver several years.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the document.<\/p>\n
Three years, contingent on closing and Daniel maintaining control.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened if I remained controlling shareholder?\u201d<\/p>\n
He didn't answer.<\/p>\n
Nina did.<\/p>\n
\u201cWestbridge could terminate the retention arrangement.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
My ownership was not merely inconvenient.<\/p>\n
It threatened six million dollars Daniel believed belonged to him.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid your family know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAndrew?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVictor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cObviously.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Westbridge know the documents affecting my ownership were disputed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they know I hadn't approved the restructuring?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel hesitated.<\/p>\n
Martin closed his eyes briefly.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel,\u201d he warned.<\/p>\n
But I already knew.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou told them I approved.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI told them you would.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's different.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI expected you eventually would.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter seeing the actual numbers?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou would have been taken care of.\u201d<\/p>\n
The phrase sickened me.<\/p>\n
Taken care of.<\/p>\n
As though my property were an allowance he could decide.<\/p>\n
I looked at Nina.<\/p>\n
\u201cContact Westbridge.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
His lawyer immediately said, \u201cSit down.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel ignored him.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire, if you contact Westbridge now, the entire transaction dies.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou say that like it's leverage.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you understand what forty-seven million dollars means?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor everyone?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmployees could cash out equity.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why didn't you disclose the transaction properly?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause deals collapse when too many people interfere.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShareholders aren't interference.\u201d<\/p>\n
He stepped toward me.<\/p>\n
Martin stood too.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel stopped.<\/p>\n
His voice lowered.<\/p>\n
\u201cPlease.\u201d<\/p>\n
Five days after Bellmont House, he had begged me to undo the restrictions.<\/p>\n
Now he was begging again.<\/p>\n
\u201cGive me forty-eight hours.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo fix this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou've been fixing things for years.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI can renegotiate.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWithout forged signatures?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWith my actual ownership intact?\u201d<\/p>\n
He hesitated.<\/p>\n
That tiny pause answered everything.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen there's nothing to discuss.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel looked at the wedding ring.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're really ending our marriage over business.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost felt sorry for him.<\/p>\n
Almost.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo, Daniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
I picked up my bag.<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm ending the business fiction because you ended the marriage privately months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
I left him with the ring.<\/p>\n
Westbridge Capital agreed to an emergency call that evening.<\/p>\n
Three representatives joined, including their managing partner, Elise Warren.<\/p>\n
Elise was a woman in her fifties with silver hair and the kind of direct expression I recognized from years of financial negotiations.<\/p>\n
\u201cMrs. Morgan,\u201d she began, \u201cI understand there is a dispute regarding shareholder authority.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is evidence my consent was falsified.\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise became still.<\/p>\n
\u201cFalsified?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina summarized the disputed authorizations.<\/p>\n
We did not overstate.<\/p>\n
Twenty-three signatures under review.<\/p>\n
Metadata irregularities.<\/p>\n
Conflicting approvals.<\/p>\n
Evidence Daniel and Victor knew direct consent had not been obtained.<\/p>\n
Elise interrupted.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe were told Mrs. Morgan had approved the restructuring conceptually.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBy whom?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Prescott and Mr. Hale.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever speak to me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe requested direct confirmation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise checked her notes.<\/p>\n
\u201cSeptember ninth.\u201d<\/p>\n
The week before our anniversary.<\/p>\n
Daniel had told the truth about that.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe were informed you were unavailable due to personal circumstances.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat circumstances?\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat your marriage was undergoing difficulties and communication should be routed through counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhose counsel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Hale.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Nina.<\/p>\n
Victor had apparently represented the transaction while simultaneously presenting himself as someone authorized to manage communications affecting me.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid anyone tell you I had independent counsel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNina has represented me for years.\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise's expression hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe were not told that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat else were you told about me?\u201d<\/p>\n
She paused.<\/p>\n
I appreciated that she considered the question rather than protecting herself with corporate language.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat you had withdrawn from active company involvement and wished to monetize your interest.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI never said that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe relied on representations made by management and transaction counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you receive anything bearing my signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe need copies.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe'll cooperate through counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is something you should know.\u201d<\/p>\n
I had come to dread that phrase from everyone.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe received an email from an address represented to be yours.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat address?\u201d<\/p>\n
She read it.<\/p>\n
[claire.morgan.private@protonmail.com](mailto:claire.morgan.private@protonmail.com).<\/p>\n
\u201cI have never used that address.\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise looked genuinely disturbed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe email confirmed support for the transaction.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAugust.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCan you send it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
It arrived while we were still on the call.<\/p>\n
I opened it.<\/p>\n
The message was brief.<\/p>\n
Elise,<\/p>\n
Daniel has explained the structure. I support the sale and understand that my voting position will change before closing. Please coordinate through Victor, as I prefer not to be involved in the day-to-day legal process.<\/p>\n
Claire<\/p>\n
The writing was not mine.<\/p>\n
Too formal in some places.<\/p>\n
Too passive in others.<\/p>\n
But to someone who didn't know me, it was plausible.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas there more correspondence?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSeven emails.\u201d<\/p>\n
My hands became cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cSend all of them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe will.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina asked, \u201cDid you ever conduct video verification?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe requested it twice.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBoth meetings were canceled.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBy whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe same email account.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the messages.<\/p>\n
Someone had not merely forged documents.<\/p>\n
Someone had impersonated me over months.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat reason was given?\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise checked.<\/p>\n
\u201cHealth issues first.\u201d<\/p>\n
My eyes narrowed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat health issues?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMigraines.\u201d<\/p>\n
I did get migraines occasionally.<\/p>\n
Daniel knew.<\/p>\n
\u201cSecond?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA family emergency.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they specify?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The impersonator had used just enough truth to sound believable.<\/p>\n
I asked, \u201cWhy didn't Westbridge insist on direct verification?\u201d<\/p>\n
Elise's face tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe eventually did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLast week.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBefore the anniversary dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd that's why the deal stalled.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel had reached the limit of what forged emails could accomplish.<\/p>\n
Westbridge wanted the real shareholder.<\/p>\n
And instead of coming to me honestly, he had sat across from me at Bellmont House and turned his resentment into a joke.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens now?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe transaction is suspended.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot terminated?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou would still consider buying Prescott Logistics?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe consider assets and businesses independently of management misconduct.\u201d<\/p>\n
A rational answer.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd the retention agreement?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSuspended with the transaction.\u201d<\/p>\n
I nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cPreserve everything.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe already have.\u201d<\/p>\n
After the call, Nina began examining the fake email headers.<\/p>\n
The Proton address itself gave us little.<\/p>\n
But Westbridge's email-security logs contained IP information.<\/p>\n
One message had been sent through a privacy service.<\/p>\n
Another from public Wi-Fi.<\/p>\n
But the earliest email had been sent without masking.<\/p>\n
The IP address belonged to a residential internet account.<\/p>\n
Nina looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cReady?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She read the subscriber.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn and Robert Prescott.\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt strangely unsurprised.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn't tell us who sent it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel could have been visiting.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMelissa.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRobert or Evelyn.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnyone using their Wi-Fi.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCorrect.\u201d<\/p>\n
Facts.<\/p>\n
Not assumptions.<\/p>\n
We requested device metadata from Westbridge.<\/p>\n
The earliest email had been composed using a MacBook.<\/p>\n
Melissa used one.<\/p>\n
Evelyn did too.<\/p>\n
Robert preferred Windows.<\/p>\n
Daniel used both.<\/p>\n
Still too broad.<\/p>\n
Then Westbridge sent the remaining emails.<\/p>\n
The third contained an attachment.<\/p>\n
A PDF supposedly written by me.<\/p>\n
Its metadata had not been scrubbed.<\/p>\n
Author:<\/p>\n
Evelyn Prescott.<\/p>\n
I stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
\u201cCould metadata populate automatically from a device owner?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes,\u201d Nina said.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo if someone used Evelyn's laptop\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt might show her name.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStill not proof.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
But the evidence was narrowing.<\/p>\n
I called Melissa.<\/p>\n
She answered immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid your mother know about the fake email account?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat fake account?\u201d<\/p>\n
I explained.<\/p>\n
Melissa went silent.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMom asked me something strange months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow ProtonMail worked.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAugust.\u201d<\/p>\n
The first fake message had been sent in August.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you tell her?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat it was encrypted email.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you help her create an account?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she ask you to?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked whether accounts required real names.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse quickened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked whether emails could be traced.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina heard.<\/p>\n
Her expression hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn't that seem strange?\u201d<\/p>\n
Melissa sounded miserable.<\/p>\n
\u201cMom is always paranoid about privacy.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she say why she wanted it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said she was helping Daniel with something confidential.\u201d<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIs she going to be arrested?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe'll say Daniel made her do it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen don't decide before investigators do.\u201d<\/p>\n
The advice was as much for me as for Melissa.<\/p>\n
That evening, outside counsel notified federal investigators about the suspected vendor kickbacks and fraudulent transaction records.<\/p>\n
The matter had moved beyond internal governance.<\/p>\n
We no longer controlled where it ended.<\/p>\n
At nine, I returned to the lake house.<\/p>\n
A package sat inside the screened porch.<\/p>\n
Security had already examined it.<\/p>\n
No sender.<\/p>\n
Inside was an old USB drive.<\/p>\n
A handwritten label read:<\/p>\n
JACK MORGAN.<\/p>\n
My father's name.<\/p>\n
Nina insisted we not connect it to anything personal.<\/p>\n
The forensic specialist arrived.<\/p>\n
He imaged the drive safely.<\/p>\n
No malware.<\/p>\n
The contents consisted mostly of spreadsheets and scanned records.<\/p>\n
Dad's private backup.<\/p>\n
Then we found an audio file.<\/p>\n
Date: six days before his death.<\/p>\n
I stared at it.<\/p>\n
Nina said, \u201cYou don't have to listen tonight.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes, I do.\u201d<\/p>\n
The recording began with rustling.<\/p>\n
Then my father's voice.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want this documented because Daniel denies the transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another voice answered.<\/p>\n
Daniel.<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm not denying it. I'm saying you don't understand it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad replied, \u201cThen explain it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was an investment.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWith company-linked money.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMoney Claire gave me to build this company.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire invested. She didn't give it to you.\u201d<\/p>\n
A pause.<\/p>\n
Then Daniel said, \u201cSomeday all of this will be mine anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n
My father laughed once.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. That's the problem, son. You think marriage is ownership.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel's voice sharpened.<\/p>\n
\u201cStay out of my marriage.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen keep your hands out of Claire's assets.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
Dad continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI've prepared documents removing your access to Holdings.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can't.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI can advise Claire to.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe won't.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou sound very sure.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe trusts me.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad's next words were quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is exactly what worries me.\u201d<\/p>\n
The recording continued for several minutes.<\/p>\n
No threats.<\/p>\n
No violence.<\/p>\n
Nothing mysterious about Dad's later death.<\/p>\n
Only an argument.<\/p>\n
But near the end, Daniel said something that explained the next five years.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Claire ever makes me choose between her and the company, she isn't going to like the answer.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad replied:<\/p>\n
\u201cThen perhaps she deserves to know you're already making the choice.\u201d<\/p>\n
The audio ended.<\/p>\n
I sat staring at the laptop.<\/p>\n
My father had understood the conflict long before I did.<\/p>\n
Not money versus marriage.<\/p>\n
Control versus partnership.<\/p>\n
My phone vibrated.<\/p>\n
Unknown number.<\/p>\n
Another message.<\/p>\n
YOU HAVE JACK'S DRIVE NOW.<\/p>\n
Nina immediately called the investigator.<\/p>\n
I typed back:<\/p>\n
Who are you?<\/p>\n
This time, a response came.<\/p>\n
SOMEONE WHO HELPED DANIEL AT THE BEGINNING.<\/p>\n
Then another.<\/p>\n
AND SOMEONE HE PLANNED TO BLAME AT THE END.<\/p>\n
I stared at the words.<\/p>\n
Rachel?<\/p>\n
Victor?<\/p>\n
Robert?<\/p>\n
Someone else?<\/p>\n
I typed:<\/p>\n
Meet me.<\/p>\n
Three dots appeared.<\/p>\n
The reply came.<\/p>\n
TOMORROW. 10 A.M. OLD PRESCOTT WAREHOUSE. COME WITH YOUR LAWYER.<\/p>\n
A final message followed.<\/p>\n
ASK DANIEL WHERE THE ORIGINAL SHARE CERTIFICATE IS BEFORE YOU COME.<\/p>\n
I looked at Nina.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
I showed her.<\/p>\n
Her face changed.<\/p>\n
The original share certificate.<\/p>\n
The document representing my controlling interest had been stored for years in the company's secure records vault.<\/p>\n
If the anonymous sender was asking about it, there was a reason.<\/p>\n
Nina called the office.<\/p>\n
Security opened the vault under camera supervision.<\/p>\n
They found the certificate binder.<\/p>\n
Daniel's certificate.<\/p>\n
Employee trust certificate.<\/p>\n
Amendments.<\/p>\n
My sleeve was empty.<\/p>\n
The original document proving my fifty-one-percent ownership was gone.<\/p>\n
Daniel stared at Nina's phone as though the screen had betrayed him personally. Martin Shaw extended his hand. \u201cMay I see that?\u201d Nina forwarded the document instead. Martin read silently. … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15822,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15834"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15834\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15862,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15834\/revisions\/15862"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}