I stared at Robert Prescott's name until the letters stopped looking like a name and became merely shapes on the screen.<\/p>\n
Finalized by: Robert Prescott.<\/p>\n
The timestamp beneath it read 11:43 p.m.<\/p>\n
Four years and eight months earlier.<\/p>\n
Nina pulled a chair beside mine. \u201cDon't assume the credential proves the person.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSomeone could have used his account.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut Robert told me he barely understood the restructuring.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis predates the restructuring.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExactly.\u201d<\/p>\n
The distinction mattered.<\/p>\n
Daniel's proposed sale to Westbridge had begun only months earlier. The document in front of us belonged to an older scheme\u2014the transfer that helped give Daniel practical control over Prescott Holdings.<\/p>\n
If Robert had knowingly participated, then the family deception had not grown out of Daniel's recent greed.<\/p>\n
It had roots.<\/p>\n
I opened the metadata panel.<\/p>\n
The file had been created from Rachel's account at 8:16 that morning. Daniel modified it at 6:42 p.m. Robert's credentials finalized it five hours later.<\/p>\n
Then the document was uploaded to the bank portal from an IP address registered to Prescott Logistics.<\/p>\n
\u201cRobert didn't work here,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo why did he have company credentials?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina searched the archived user list.<\/p>\n
Robert Prescott appeared as an external adviser.<\/p>\n
Access granted six years earlier.<\/p>\n
Access revoked three years later.<\/p>\n
I had never approved it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho authorized the account?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina opened the administrative record.<\/p>\n
Daniel.<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat permissions?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDocument review. Secure signing. Board archive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe wasn't on the board.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe wasn't an employee.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why give him signing access?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe need to ask Daniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI want the IT logs first.\u201d<\/p>\n
The forensic team retrieved them shortly after midnight.<\/p>\n
Most were mundane.<\/p>\n
Robert had logged in occasionally to view documents Daniel shared with him.<\/p>\n
But the night of the first false consent, something unusual happened.<\/p>\n
Robert's account logged in from a workstation inside Daniel's executive office.<\/p>\n
I felt disappointment before I felt anger.<\/p>\n
There was still an innocent explanation.<\/p>\n
Daniel could have used his father's credentials.<\/p>\n
That would make Robert careless, perhaps ignorant, but not necessarily complicit.<\/p>\n
Then Nina found an email.<\/p>\n
Daniel to Robert.<\/p>\n
Subject: Tonight.<\/p>\n
Dad,<\/p>\n
Need you here after everyone leaves. Bring the token. We need to finish the Holdings paperwork before tomorrow.<\/p>\n
Robert replied:<\/p>\n
Your mother doesn't like this.<\/p>\n
Daniel:<\/p>\n
Mom likes the result.<\/p>\n
Robert:<\/p>\n
And Claire?<\/p>\n
Daniel:<\/p>\n
Handled.<\/p>\n
Robert:<\/p>\n
I don't want trouble later.<\/p>\n
Daniel:<\/p>\n
There won't be any.<\/p>\n
I read the exchange twice.<\/p>\n
Robert had asked about me.<\/p>\n
He had known I mattered.<\/p>\n
Whatever Daniel told him afterward, Robert had understood enough to question my involvement before the first forged consent was finalized.<\/p>\n
\u201cCall him,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
\u201cAt twelve thirty in the morning?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe's awake.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow do you know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause people who are waiting for secrets to surface don't sleep well.\u201d<\/p>\n
Robert answered on the second ring.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou need to come to the office.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat's happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI found the first consent.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
Not confusion.<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
I looked at Nina.<\/p>\n
She heard it too.<\/p>\n
\u201cRobert?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know what you're talking about.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes, you do.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire, it's late.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFour years and eight months ago, you came to Prescott Logistics after hours carrying an authentication token.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nothing.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour account finalized a shareholder consent bearing my forged signature.\u201d<\/p>\n
His breathing changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel said you approved it.\u201d<\/p>\n
The speed of the excuse told me he had been waiting years to use it.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why wasn't I here?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were traveling.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI was at home that week.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another silence.<\/p>\n
I remembered because it was the week my father's lake house had needed emergency plumbing repairs. Daniel had complained that I spent too much time dealing with an old property we barely used.<\/p>\n
\u201cCome to the office.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI can't.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn isn't well.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen I'll come to you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The word was immediate.<\/p>\n
Too immediate.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause this family has had enough confrontation.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the forged consent.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou should have thought about that before helping Daniel use my signature.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn't forge anything.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you finalize the document?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't remember.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou brought your authentication token.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel handled technical things.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou asked him about me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I wanted to make sure everything was proper.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd when he said I was \u2018handled,\u2019 that satisfied you?\u201d<\/p>\n
Robert's voice hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're twisting an old conversation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. I'm reading it.\u201d<\/p>\n
He became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere did you get that email?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat matters to you more than what it says?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you knowingly approve a document carrying a signature you never saw me provide?\u201d<\/p>\n
He didn't answer.<\/p>\n
\u201cRobert.\u201d<\/p>\n
Finally he said, \u201cI trusted my son.\u201d<\/p>\n
The sentence was almost identical to the excuse I had once made for myself.<\/p>\n
The difference was that Robert had helped turn that trust into an action affecting my property.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo did I,\u201d I said. \u201cBut I didn't sign away someone else's rights for him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI never thought it would hurt you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you think it would do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said the Holdings account needed administrative restructuring.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor investment flexibility.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd why did that require my signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said the lawyers required it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ask whether I'd signed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe showed me the document.\u201d<\/p>\n
There.<\/p>\n
The first clean admission.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou saw my signature.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you see me sign?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you speak to me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen you didn't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
He exhaled heavily.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor finally saying something true.\u201d<\/p>\n
I ended the call.<\/p>\n
Nina watched me.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat was useful.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt doesn't prove he knew it was forged.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. But it establishes he participated despite having no direct confirmation.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the clock.<\/p>\n
12:51 a.m.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere's something else.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel told Robert that his mother liked the result.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cI noticed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn knew about Prescott Holdings before Westbridge.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe funded the restructuring lawyers later.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Robert had access credentials.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis wasn't Daniel slowly corrupting an innocent family.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina closed the laptop.<\/p>\n
\u201cFamilies are rarely that simple.\u201d<\/p>\n
We finally left the office at two.<\/p>\n
The security driver took me to the lake house.<\/p>\n
I expected exhaustion to knock me unconscious.<\/p>\n
Instead, I sat at my father's kitchen table and remembered a dinner from five years earlier.<\/p>\n
Daniel had just signed Northline.<\/p>\n
My father was still alive.<\/p>\n
He had listened while Daniel described the company's growth.<\/p>\n
Then Dad asked a question.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens if Claire disagrees with you?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe usually doesn't.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dad hadn't laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's not what I asked.\u201d<\/p>\n
At the time, I thought my father was being protective.<\/p>\n
Now I wondered whether he had seen something I hadn't.<\/p>\n
My phone vibrated.<\/p>\n
Unknown number.<\/p>\n
I opened the message.<\/p>\n
ROBERT DIDN'T CREATE THE FORGERY. HE APPROVED IT.<\/p>\n
A second message arrived.<\/p>\n
ASK WHO TAUGHT DANIEL TO USE PRESCOTT HOLDINGS.<\/p>\n
I stared at the words.<\/p>\n
I typed:<\/p>\n
Tell me your name.<\/p>\n
No answer.<\/p>\n
I tried again.<\/p>\n
If you're helping me, stop hiding.<\/p>\n
Nothing.<\/p>\n
I called Nina.<\/p>\n
She answered sleepily.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnother message?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I read it.<\/p>\n
\u201cInteresting.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou sound half dead.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI was asleep.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSorry.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDon't be. Send screenshots.\u201d<\/p>\n
I did.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho taught Daniel to use Prescott Holdings?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe'll search.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould be a lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAccountant. Adviser. Banker.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRobert?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
The next morning, the answer came from an unexpected source.<\/p>\n
Marcus walked into my temporary office carrying an old cardboard archive box.<\/p>\n
\u201cI found this in off-site storage.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRecords from the year Prescott Holdings was created.\u201d<\/p>\n
I opened the lid.<\/p>\n
Tax documents.<\/p>\n
Corporate diagrams.<\/p>\n
Handwritten notes.<\/p>\n
Then I saw my father's handwriting.<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
He had attended several early planning meetings because I trusted his business judgment.<\/p>\n
One yellow legal pad contained a diagram.<\/p>\n
Prescott Logistics at the center.<\/p>\n
Prescott Holdings above it.<\/p>\n
Arrows indicating ownership and distributions.<\/p>\n
Beside the diagram my father had written:<\/p>\n
Holding company must remain Claire-controlled. Daniel may manage investments, never alter beneficiary\/control without Claire.<\/p>\n
I ran my fingers over the handwriting.<\/p>\n
Marcus said quietly, \u201cThere's more.\u201d<\/p>\n
Beneath the pad was a memorandum from our original accountant, Thomas Weller.<\/p>\n
Thomas had retired three years earlier.<\/p>\n
The memo warned against using Prescott Holdings as a personal distribution vehicle.<\/p>\n
I read the final paragraph.<\/p>\n
Any transfer of controlling authority away from Claire Morgan would require her direct written consent and independent verification.<\/p>\n
\u201cIndependent verification,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
Nina, standing behind me, nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe forged consent shouldn't have been enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo someone bypassed the verification.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOr falsely certified it.\u201d<\/p>\n
We searched the file.<\/p>\n
Attached to the consent was a verification page.<\/p>\n
I hadn't seen it in the bank records because it had been stored separately.<\/p>\n
The certifying party was not Robert.<\/p>\n
Not Daniel.<\/p>\n
Not Rachel.<\/p>\n
Thomas Weller.<\/p>\n
I stared at his signature.<\/p>\n
\u201cThomas would never do this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're sure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe was my father's accountant for twenty years.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn't make him incapable.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I hated how often I had learned that lesson lately.<\/p>\n
Nina searched for contact information.<\/p>\n
Thomas Weller was seventy-one and living two states away.<\/p>\n
She called.<\/p>\n
He answered.<\/p>\n
After identifying herself, Nina explained that we were reviewing Prescott Holdings.<\/p>\n
Thomas interrupted.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs Claire there?\u201d<\/p>\n
I took the phone.<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm here.\u201d<\/p>\n
His voice softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm sorry about your father.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe was a good man.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe found a shareholder consent bearing my signature.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat consent?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTransfer of administrative control over Prescott Holdings.\u201d<\/p>\n
Thomas became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
I gave him the date.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The certainty was immediate.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou remember?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI remember because I was hospitalized that week.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Nina.<\/p>\n
\u201cHospitalized?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGallbladder surgery. I was out for nearly two weeks.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour signature appears on the verification.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is impossible.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another forged signature.<\/p>\n
Or copied certification.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho covered your work?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy junior partner.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cName?\u201d<\/p>\n
Thomas hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cVictor Hale.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina's head snapped toward me.<\/p>\n
Hale.<\/p>\n
As in Hale, Norris & Beckett.<\/p>\n
The law firm handling the Westbridge restructuring.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs Victor Hale an attorney?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe became one later. Back then he was finishing his law degree while working in our advisory practice.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he know Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVery well.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow well?\u201d<\/p>\n
Another pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel recruited him away from us.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout four years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
The circle tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cThomas, did Victor have access to your digital certification?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe shouldn't have.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat isn't what I asked.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould he have used it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI suppose.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nina wrote the name.<\/p>\n
\u201cWould you be willing to provide a statement?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbsolutely.\u201d<\/p>\n
Before we hung up, Thomas said something that stayed with me.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire, your father worried about Daniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
My throat tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe last year of his life.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe thought success was changing him.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked toward the yellow legal pad.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Dad say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat Daniel had started confusing control with ownership.\u201d<\/p>\n
I swallowed.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he ever tell Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSeveral times.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they argue?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOnce badly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout Prescott Holdings?\u201d<\/p>\n
Thomas became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I sat straighter.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour father wanted to remove Daniel's management access.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse quickened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe found a transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat transfer?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't remember the amount.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at Nina.<\/p>\n
This had started before my father's death.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Dad reverse it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Daniel know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVery much so.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened afterward?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour father asked me to prepare revised documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat documents?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo remove Daniel from Prescott Holdings completely.\u201d<\/p>\n
My breath caught.<\/p>\n
\u201cWere they signed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI sent them to your father.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThree days before he died.\u201d<\/p>\n
The room became silent.<\/p>\n
My father had died from a sudden heart attack.<\/p>\n
There had never been any mystery around it.<\/p>\n
I refused to let my mind manufacture one now.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you send them to me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour father said he would discuss everything with you personally.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe never did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI assumed he hadn't had time.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere are the documents?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI may have copies.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFind them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI will.\u201d<\/p>\n
After the call, Nina touched my arm.<\/p>\n
\u201cDon't connect things that aren't connected.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn't.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes, you were.\u201d<\/p>\n
She was right.<\/p>\n
Grief had opened a door that evidence had not.<\/p>\n
My father's death was medically documented.<\/p>\n
What mattered was the paperwork he had been preparing.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf those documents removed Daniel's access\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen someone had a reason to make sure they never became effective.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marcus searched the archive box again.<\/p>\n
At the bottom was a sealed envelope.<\/p>\n
My name was written across the front.<\/p>\n
CLAIRE.<\/p>\n
My father's handwriting.<\/p>\n
The seal had been broken.<\/p>\n
I stopped breathing.<\/p>\n
Inside was a letter.<\/p>\n
The first sentence read:<\/p>\n
Claire, if you're reading this, it means I failed to speak to you before Daniel discovered what I found.<\/p>\n
I stared at Robert Prescott's name until the letters stopped looking like a name and became merely shapes on the screen. Finalized by: Robert Prescott. The timestamp beneath it read … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15708,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15717"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15745,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15717\/revisions\/15745"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}