The subpoena arrived almost four years after my $312.17 paycheck.<\/p>\n
I had always known it might.<\/p>\n
Outside counsel warned me early that the consulting-payment investigation could eventually require testimony.<\/p>\n
Knowing did not make the envelope pleasant.<\/p>\n
I was asked to testify as a factual witness.<\/p>\n
Not about Grant's character.<\/p>\n
Not Vane's motives.<\/p>\n
Records.<\/p>\n
Payroll history.<\/p>\n
Field practices.<\/p>\n
The investigation chronology.<\/p>\n
Outside counsel prepared me.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnswer the question asked.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not speculate.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not volunteer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not argue.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at her.<\/p>\n
She looked back.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat one is specifically for you.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fair.<\/p>\n
The legal proceedings had grown complicated over the years.<\/p>\n
Some civil matters resolved.<\/p>\n
Some financial recoveries completed.<\/p>\n
The government case focused on specific undisclosed financial transactions and representations surrounding consulting arrangements.<\/p>\n
Not every harmful act at Hartwell became part of the case.<\/p>\n
That distinction frustrated some employees.<\/p>\n
They wanted the courtroom to judge the whole story.<\/p>\n
Courts don't work that way.<\/p>\n
Neither should they.<\/p>\n
Legal guilt is not a summary grade for a person's life.<\/p>\n
My testimony lasted less than a day.<\/p>\n
I described my role.<\/p>\n
My original paycheck.<\/p>\n
How the internal review began.<\/p>\n
How records were preserved.<\/p>\n
What systems we identified.<\/p>\n
How North Bridge payments surfaced.<\/p>\n
What I personally observed.<\/p>\n
Grant sat at the defense table.<\/p>\n
I had not seen him in years.<\/p>\n
He looked older.<\/p>\n
Thinner.<\/p>\n
Still composed.<\/p>\n
He watched me without expression.<\/p>\n
At one point, his attorney asked whether I had become professionally successful because of the investigation.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou received a promotion?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI received a different job after resigning from my original one.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHigher salary?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExpanded influence?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPublic recognition?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFinancial restitution?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The implication was obvious.<\/p>\n
Benefit.<\/p>\n
Bias.<\/p>\n
Motive.<\/p>\n
All fair territory.<\/p>\n
Then he asked, \u201cWould it be accurate to say this investigation transformed your career?\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
He smiled slightly.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you have therefore benefited substantially from allegations against my client.\u201d<\/p>\n
Outside counsel had warned me not to fight the premise.<\/p>\n
So I answered exactly.<\/p>\n
\u201cI benefited from what Hartwell chose to do after records showed employees had been improperly charged. That does not change the records.\u201d<\/p>\n
His smile disappeared.<\/p>\n
No triumph.<\/p>\n
Just answer.<\/p>\n
The government attorney later asked whether I considered Grant responsible for my $312 paycheck.<\/p>\n
\u201cPartly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy partly?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMultiple people and systems contributed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas Mr. Hart one of them?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas he the only one?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered to me.<\/p>\n
I did not want the courtroom turning Hartwell into a story where one executive corrupted an otherwise innocent company.<\/p>\n
The evidence did not support that.<\/p>\n
Richard's old program mattered.<\/p>\n
Benton mattered.<\/p>\n
Derek mattered.<\/p>\n
Rachel mattered.<\/p>\n
Vane mattered.<\/p>\n
Finance failures mattered.<\/p>\n
Board failures mattered.<\/p>\n
Employees adapting quietly mattered in a different way.<\/p>\n
Even my own later mistakes mattered.<\/p>\n
Systems are crowded places.<\/p>\n
Responsibility can be uneven without becoming singular.<\/p>\n
When my testimony ended, I walked out through a side corridor.<\/p>\n
Reporters waited beyond the security line.<\/p>\n
I declined to speak.<\/p>\n
A young journalist called after me.<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Mercer, what outcome do you want?\u201d<\/p>\n
I kept walking.<\/p>\n
The question stayed with me anyway.<\/p>\n
What outcome did I want?<\/p>\n
Years earlier, I would have answered easily.<\/p>\n
My money back.<\/p>\n
Then maybe Derek punished.<\/p>\n
Grant exposed.<\/p>\n
Vane held accountable.<\/p>\n
Employees repaid.<\/p>\n
Records corrected.<\/p>\n
Every stage created a new finish line.<\/p>\n
The courtroom threatened to create another.<\/p>\n
Conviction.<\/p>\n
Acquittal.<\/p>\n
Settlement.<\/p>\n
Sentence.<\/p>\n
Appeal.<\/p>\n
There would always be another procedural ending.<\/p>\n
Laura understood before I did.<\/p>\n
That night she asked about testimony.<\/p>\n
I told her.<\/p>\n
Then I mentioned the reporter's question.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat would you say now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes, you do.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at her.<\/p>\n
She waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want the result to be based on evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's the legal answer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is also my answer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor Grant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd for you?\u201d<\/p>\n
I frowned.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen do you stop needing what happens to Grant to finish your story?\u201d<\/p>\n
I did not like that question.<\/p>\n
Which usually meant it was good.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou still read every legal update.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt's relevant.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo Field Integrity?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo you?\u201d<\/p>\n
I didn't answer.<\/p>\n
Laura sat beside me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou built a whole office around not letting one person control the system.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen don't let Grant control whether you're done with this.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was irritatingly correct.<\/p>\n
The proceedings continued without me.<\/p>\n
Hartwell cooperated.<\/p>\n
Employees followed news.<\/p>\n
Some obsessively.<\/p>\n
Some not at all.<\/p>\n
Caleb stopped reading after the second week.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I have work.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is unusually healthy.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDon't tell anyone.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn followed closely because she had governance obligations.<\/p>\n
Naomi followed because the board did.<\/p>\n
I stopped checking every day.<\/p>\n
Then every week.<\/p>\n
Legal updates went to a designated folder.<\/p>\n
If Hartwell needed action, counsel told us.<\/p>\n
Otherwise, I worked.<\/p>\n
We had problems.<\/p>\n
Ordinary ones.<\/p>\n
A supervisor misclassified standby hours.<\/p>\n
Fixed.<\/p>\n
A software update rounded mileage incorrectly for twelve employees.<\/p>\n
Fixed before next payroll.<\/p>\n
A benefits vendor sent confusing notices.<\/p>\n
Rewritten.<\/p>\n
One technician accused a manager of retaliation.<\/p>\n
Independent review found insufficient evidence.<\/p>\n
The employee appealed.<\/p>\n
Second review reached the same conclusion.<\/p>\n
He was angry.<\/p>\n
That mattered too.<\/p>\n
A fair system had to survive telling someone no.<\/p>\n
We gave him the evidence basis.<\/p>\n
He disagreed.<\/p>\n
He remained employed.<\/p>\n
No schedule retaliation.<\/p>\n
No hidden deductions.<\/p>\n
No performance punishment for appealing.<\/p>\n
That was success too, though nobody liked calling it that.<\/p>\n
Then something I had not expected happened.<\/p>\n
My three-year term approached renewal again.<\/p>\n
This time I was tired.<\/p>\n
Not burned out.<\/p>\n
Just aware that I had been living inside Hartwell's correction for years.<\/p>\n
Mia was in high school now.<\/p>\n
Laura had changed jobs.<\/p>\n
Benny was gone.<\/p>\n
That loss had happened quietly one winter.<\/p>\n
Old age.<\/p>\n
A family decision.<\/p>\n
A terrible afternoon.<\/p>\n
Hartwell had nothing to do with it.<\/p>\n
Life had continued around the investigation.<\/p>\n
That realization changed something.<\/p>\n
I had once thought staying at Hartwell meant refusing to run from what happened.<\/p>\n
Now leaving might simply mean moving forward.<\/p>\n
Evelyn sensed it.<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you thinking about not renewing?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
She did not argue.<\/p>\n
That almost disappointed me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat would you do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cField work?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe consulting.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou hate consultants.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI hate bad consultants.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEverybody says that before becoming one.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFair.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked through the glass toward the training floor.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you think the system survives without you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is the only reason I would consider leaving.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer felt strange.<\/p>\n
Our office had eleven people.<\/p>\n
Not built around me.<\/p>\n
Jalen could lead field reviews.<\/p>\n
Sonia ran analytics.<\/p>\n
Karen had finally retired again, supposedly permanently.<\/p>\n
Nathan chaired the supervisor advisory panel.<\/p>\n
Naomi's board role strengthened employee access.<\/p>\n
Linda's finance controls were institutional.<\/p>\n
Payroll tests ran automatically.<\/p>\n
Complaints routed independently.<\/p>\n
The employee council elected new members without me.<\/p>\n
That was the point.<\/p>\n
A system dependent on Daniel Mercer had failed.<\/p>\n
My departure would be a test.<\/p>\n
I told my team first.<\/p>\n
No date yet.<\/p>\n
Just that I might not seek another full term.<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
Then Jalen said, \u201cWho gets your wall?\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is your concern?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe frames are historical assets.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sonia said, \u201cWe could digitize them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cArchive them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb arrived ten minutes later despite not being invited.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did you hear?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIntegrity office leaks.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI should investigate.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're leaving?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
He nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's rude.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
He became serious.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou've stayed long enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow do you know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause people come to this office asking for Sonia now.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was more persuasive than any board review.<\/p>\n
Field Integrity no longer meant me.<\/p>\n
The court case reached a verdict months later.<\/p>\n
I learned from a news alert while standing in a hardware store with Mia.<\/p>\n
We were buying parts for a school robotics project.<\/p>\n
My phone buzzed.<\/p>\n
I looked.<\/p>\n
Then locked the screen.<\/p>\n
Mia noticed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWork?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOld work.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBad?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cComplicated.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo we need to go?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
We kept shopping.<\/p>\n
That mattered more than I expected.<\/p>\n
Later, at home, I read the verified legal update.<\/p>\n
There had been mixed outcomes across charges and parties.<\/p>\n
Some findings against Grant.<\/p>\n
Some issues unresolved or decided differently than employees predicted.<\/p>\n
Vane's case had its own result.<\/p>\n
Appeals were expected.<\/p>\n
I did not treat it as vindication.<\/p>\n
Nor disappointment.<\/p>\n
The court answered the questions placed before it.<\/p>\n
That was enough.<\/p>\n
Hartwell issued a factual statement.<\/p>\n
No celebration.<\/p>\n
No \u201cjustice served.\u201d<\/p>\n
No corporate self-congratulation.<\/p>\n
We acknowledged the outcome and confirmed ongoing controls and restitution remained unchanged.<\/p>\n
The next morning, Caleb walked into my office.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou spent years waiting for that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn't waiting.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were a little.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow do you feel?\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought about it.<\/p>\n
\u201cMostly the same.\u201d<\/p>\n
He smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy good?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMeans the important part happened before yesterday.\u201d<\/p>\n
He was right.<\/p>\n
The important part was Marcus getting money back.<\/p>\n
Teresa getting Kevin's name corrected.<\/p>\n
Claire receiving Arthur's letter.<\/p>\n
Walter eating lunch with Benton.<\/p>\n
Rebecca's hotel reimbursement.<\/p>\n
Caleb challenging me.<\/p>\n
Payroll stopping three bad combinations automatically.<\/p>\n
Employees telling Hartwell things it did not want to hear.<\/p>\n
The verdict mattered.<\/p>\n
It was not the ending.<\/p>\n
That afternoon I told Evelyn I would not seek another full term.<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSix months.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTransition?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSuccessor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIndependent search.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot Jalen automatically?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause you finally learned succession.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI resent that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
The board opened the search.<\/p>\n
Internal and external candidates.<\/p>\n
Employees participated.<\/p>\n
Advisory council interviewed finalists.<\/p>\n
No one asked me to choose.<\/p>\n
I preferred it that way.<\/p>\n
The final candidate was Sonia.<\/p>\n
Not because she worked for me.<\/p>\n
Because everyone else decided she was best.<\/p>\n
She asked me privately whether I thought she should take it.<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cAbsolutely not answering that.\u201d<\/p>\n
She groaned.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou know why.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen decide.\u201d<\/p>\n
She accepted.<\/p>\n
My last six months became intentionally boring.<\/p>\n
No dramatic investigations.<\/p>\n
No secret reserve.<\/p>\n
No executive misconduct.<\/p>\n
Just transition.<\/p>\n
Policies.<\/p>\n
Open cases.<\/p>\n
Relationships.<\/p>\n
Lessons.<\/p>\n
Mistakes.<\/p>\n
Things I wished I had done differently.<\/p>\n
I gave Sonia one file not in the official archive.<\/p>\n
Not evidence.<\/p>\n
A list.<\/p>\n
Questions.<\/p>\n
What are employees tolerating because the amount seems too small?<\/p>\n
Which metrics improve when people stop reporting problems?<\/p>\n
Who reviews the reviewer?<\/p>\n
What control have we started calling inefficient?<\/p>\n
Which decisions depend on one trusted person?<\/p>\n
What are new hires afraid to say?<\/p>\n
What rule do we obey without remembering why?<\/p>\n
What happens when the current leaders leave?<\/p>\n
Sonia read it.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is depressing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLeadership.\u201d<\/p>\n
She folded it.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything optimistic?\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen people challenge you, don't make them regret it.\u201d<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is better.\u201d<\/p>\n
On my final week, I took the framed paycheck off the wall.<\/p>\n
Everyone objected.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is mine.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCompany history,\u201d Jalen said.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy name is on it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can redact.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sonia pointed to the other frames.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the shortcut?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cArchive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCaleb appeal?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAsk Caleb.\u201d<\/p>\n
He wanted it.<\/p>\n
Of course he did.<\/p>\n
Evelyn's control finding went to the governance archive.<\/p>\n
Richard's note stayed in the office.<\/p>\n
So did Benton's warning.<\/p>\n
Not because they belonged to me.<\/p>\n
Because the reasons belonged to the role.<\/p>\n
My $312 paycheck was personal.<\/p>\n
The system it exposed was not.<\/p>\n
I packed it in my box.<\/p>\n
Not the same cardboard box from years earlier.<\/p>\n
A better one.<\/p>\n
Still contained a chipped Hartwell mug.<\/p>\n
I had kept it.<\/p>\n
Laura laughed when she saw.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou own other mugs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis one has historical value.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt has a broken handle.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cArtifact.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTrash.\u201d<\/p>\n
We compromised.<\/p>\n
It stayed.<\/p>\n
My last day arrived without speeches until four.<\/p>\n
Then everyone ignored my request.<\/p>\n
Service bay.<\/p>\n
Employees.<\/p>\n
Former employees.<\/p>\n
Board members.<\/p>\n
Laura and Mia.<\/p>\n
Evelyn.<\/p>\n
Sonia.<\/p>\n
Caleb stood near the front looking far too pleased with himself.<\/p>\n
I kept my remarks short.<\/p>\n
\u201cYears ago, I thought the problem was a paycheck.\u201d<\/p>\n
People smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was a paycheck. That mattered.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the room.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut it was also a system that taught people to tolerate small things until the small things became normal.\u201d<\/p>\n
I glanced toward Sonia.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe best thing Hartwell can do now is stop needing anyone in this room to be heroic.\u201d<\/p>\n
No applause line intended.<\/p>\n
They applauded anyway.<\/p>\n
Afterward, Evelyn handed me an envelope.<\/p>\n
I looked at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf this is another job offer\u2014\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt isn't.\u201d<\/p>\n
I opened it.<\/p>\n
A copy of my resignation letter.<\/p>\n
The original one I had submitted years earlier.<\/p>\n
Beneath it, HR had added a final employment record.<\/p>\n
Reason for departure:<\/p>\n
Voluntary completion of term.<\/p>\n
Eligible for rehire.<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou kept the resignation?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRecords.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFair.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then she gave me another page.<\/p>\n
My first final paycheck.<\/p>\n
$312.17.<\/p>\n
And my actual final Hartwell paycheck now.<\/p>\n
Correct.<\/p>\n
Clear.<\/p>\n
No mystery lines.<\/p>\n
No deductions.<\/p>\n
Everything explained.<\/p>\n
I stared at the two numbers.<\/p>\n
Evelyn said quietly, \u201cBetter?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was all.<\/p>\n
No revenge.<\/p>\n
No grand apology.<\/p>\n
Just a paycheck that made sense.<\/p>\n
The subpoena arrived almost four years after my $312.17 paycheck. I had always known it might. Outside counsel warned me early that the consulting-payment investigation could eventually require testimony. Knowing … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13557,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13609"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13609\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13636,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13609\/revisions\/13636"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}