Grant did not leave the conference room when Evelyn told him the review would continue.<\/p>\n
For several seconds he remained perfectly still, one hand resting against the polished table, as though the meeting had become an argument he could still win if everyone else simply regained perspective. Derek stared down at the copied emails in front of him. Rachel sat beside outside counsel with her hands folded so tightly that the knuckles had gone pale.<\/p>\n
Harold broke the silence first.<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant, your access to compensation systems is suspended effective immediately.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant looked at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can't do that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI just did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI oversee operations.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot today.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant gave a short laugh.<\/p>\n
\u201cBased on what? A collection of disputed records and a technician with a grievance?\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt the old instinct rise in me\u2014the urge to defend myself before anyone could define me.<\/p>\n
Evelyn spoke before I did.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel's grievance is irrelevant to your suspension.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant turned toward her.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why is he sitting here?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause his paycheck exposed a process nobody in this room could justify.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt exposed nothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn tapped the binder.<\/p>\n
\u201cTwo hundred seventeen employees.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPotentially.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNearly two million dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnverified.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAltered service reports.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant's expression did not change.<\/p>\n
\u201cAlleged.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cInstructions to keep deductions below review thresholds.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTaken out of context.\u201d<\/p>\n
Harold leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen help us understand the context.\u201d<\/p>\n
For the first time, Grant hesitated.<\/p>\n
It lasted less than a second, but I saw it.<\/p>\n
So did Evelyn.<\/p>\n
Grant sat again.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe field organization was deteriorating.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDefine deteriorating,\u201d Harold said.<\/p>\n
\u201cCost overruns. Repeat calls. Technicians ignoring dispatch windows. Excessive overtime. Parts usage. Customer credits.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAll documented?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why split compensation adjustments?\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant looked toward the CFO.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't accept your characterization.\u201d<\/p>\n
The CFO had barely spoken through most of the meeting. His name was Peter Lang, and until three days earlier I had known him only as the man whose signature appeared beneath quarterly financial announcements. He opened his laptop.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis isn't characterization.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant looked at him.<\/p>\n
Peter rotated the screen toward the center of the table.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe traced one hundred twenty-eight adjustment sequences above five hundred dollars. Ninety-three were divided into smaller entries that individually avoided secondary review.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's a system limitation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo,\u201d Peter said. \u201cThe system can process a single adjustment of any amount. Someone deliberately entered multiple smaller transactions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Derek looked at Grant.<\/p>\n
That look mattered.<\/p>\n
Until then, Derek had seemed like a man afraid of losing his job.<\/p>\n
Now he looked like a man wondering how much of the job he had actually understood.<\/p>\n
Grant noticed.<\/p>\n
\u201cDon't,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Derek's head lifted.<\/p>\n
\u201cDon't what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStart pretending you weren't involved.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI approved what you told us to approve.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou exercised management discretion.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou sent the numbers.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant's face hardened.<\/p>\n
Evelyn held up one hand.<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek, you'll have an opportunity to answer separately.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI'd like that opportunity now.\u201d<\/p>\n
Outside counsel whispered something to Rachel. She nodded but said nothing.<\/p>\n
Derek pushed one of the printed emails across the table.<\/p>\n
\u201cLook at the dates.\u201d<\/p>\n
Harold did.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about them?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThese instructions came from Grant before monthly performance close.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant stared at him.<\/p>\n
Derek continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe got lists. Calls that exceeded labor estimates. Vehicle incidents. Customer escalations. Missing surveys. Whatever Operations flagged.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd what did you do with the lists?\u201d Evelyn asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe reviewed them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSupervisors submitted explanations.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmployee explanations?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes?\u201d<\/p>\n
Derek swallowed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe were under pressure to close adjustments before payroll lock.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant shook his head.<\/p>\n
\u201cPressure is not instruction.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou sent emails saying unresolved items should be assessed against technician accountability.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's standard management language.\u201d<\/p>\n
Derek almost laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou wrote, \u2018No unresolved loss should remain on Operations at month-end.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant's eyes sharpened.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat refers to cost allocation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen where were we supposed to put it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot into an employee's paycheck without documented authorization.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant looked around the room.<\/p>\n
Nobody helped him.<\/p>\n
Harold closed the binder.<\/p>\n
\u201cSeparate interviews begin today.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want counsel present.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou may have counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd I want Daniel removed from this investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn's answer was immediate.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe has a conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe has firsthand knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe is also an employee claimant.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFormer employee.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEven worse.\u201d<\/p>\n
I finally spoke.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf my involvement becomes a problem, remove me.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant looked pleased.<\/p>\n
Evelyn did not.<\/p>\n
I continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut preserve every record before you do.\u201d<\/p>\n
His expression changed.<\/p>\n
I had learned something during the first two weeks of the audit. People were less worried about questions than they were about preservation. Questions could be argued. Records had timestamps.<\/p>\n
Harold nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cFinance is already preserving mailboxes, payroll tables, authorization histories, mobile records issued by the company, and file revisions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel looked toward him.<\/p>\n
\u201cCompany mobile records?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy phone too?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf it's company-issued and falls within the authorized review.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sat back.<\/p>\n
Something passed between her and Grant.<\/p>\n
Small.<\/p>\n
Fast.<\/p>\n
But I saw it.<\/p>\n
Peter saw it too.<\/p>\n
The meeting ended at 10:18.<\/p>\n
By noon, Finance had locked Grant's and Derek's administrative permissions. HR suspended modification privileges in the performance system. IT began preserving archived mailboxes.<\/p>\n
At 1:06, Peter found me in the secure records room.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou need to see something.\u201d<\/p>\n
He looked worse than he had that morning.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cApproval history.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI've seen Grant's approvals.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot these.\u201d<\/p>\n
He closed the door.<\/p>\n
On his laptop was an old accounting interface I had never seen. It dated back four years, before Hartwell migrated to the current system.<\/p>\n
Peter pointed to a column.<\/p>\n
\u201cExecutive review code.\u201d<\/p>\n
The initials were GH.<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat's different?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLook at the amounts.\u201d<\/p>\n
I scanned them.<\/p>\n
Forty-eight dollars.<\/p>\n
One hundred twenty.<\/p>\n
Three hundred ninety-five.<\/p>\n
Two hundred ten.<\/p>\n
Then I saw the dates.<\/p>\n
All of them clustered within a single fiscal year.<\/p>\n
Hartwell's most profitable year on record.<\/p>\n
The year management had celebrated record margins.<\/p>\n
The year we received matching jackets and a companywide email thanking employees for discipline.<\/p>\n
I remembered that year differently.<\/p>\n
We had been exhausted.<\/p>\n
Travel had increased.<\/p>\n
Overtime approvals had tightened.<\/p>\n
Hotel reimbursements had become harder.<\/p>\n
Suddenly, tiny deductions seemed to appear everywhere.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Peter clicked a summary.<\/p>\n
\u201cAcross all field compensation adjustments that year? Just over six hundred twenty thousand.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cAll improper?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don't know yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut enough to matter.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo profit.\u201d<\/p>\n
He looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was the first time anyone had said it directly.<\/p>\n
Until then, the deductions had looked like bad management. Petty control. Punitive bureaucracy. Maybe even widespread abuse.<\/p>\n
Now there was another possibility.<\/p>\n
Money removed from technicians did not vanish.<\/p>\n
It stayed with Hartwell.<\/p>\n
And if enough stayed, margins improved.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas executive compensation tied to margin?\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter didn't answer immediately.<\/p>\n
That was answer enough.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant's annual incentive included operating margin, service profitability, customer retention, and cost performance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSmaller bonus. Similar structure.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRachel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHR metrics. Not directly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about you?\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter met my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cCompany profitability affects my bonus.\u201d<\/p>\n
I appreciated that he didn't dodge it.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPartly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHarold?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBoard compensation isn't structured that way.\u201d<\/p>\n
I sat back.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo everybody had some reason not to look too closely.\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter's mouth tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's one interpretation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat's yours?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy job was to know where margins came from.\u201d<\/p>\n
He stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd I didn't know this.\u201d<\/p>\n
That admission seemed difficult for him.<\/p>\n
\u201cWere the deductions visible in Finance?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen how didn't you know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey weren't categorized as employee deductions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat were they categorized as?\u201d<\/p>\n
He clicked another field.<\/p>\n
\u201cOperational recovery credits.\u201d<\/p>\n
I read it twice.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds like money recovered from vendors.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOr customers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot employees.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho created the code?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe're tracing it.\u201d<\/p>\n
We found the answer forty minutes later.<\/p>\n
The code had been created three years and eleven months earlier by a finance systems analyst named Nora Kim.<\/p>\n
Nora still worked for Hartwell.<\/p>\n
She was in corporate accounting.<\/p>\n
Peter called her to the records room.<\/p>\n
She arrived carrying a notebook, clearly worried about why the CFO wanted her personally.<\/p>\n
Peter showed her the code.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you remember creating this?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nora leaned toward the screen.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cService recoveries.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat kind?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCredits back to operating units.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom where?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVendors, warranty recoveries, insurance, customer chargebacks.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmployees?\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked confused.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter opened the transaction list.<\/p>\n
Nora's confusion disappeared.<\/p>\n
\u201cThese aren't supposed to be here.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow can you tell?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe source table.\u201d<\/p>\n
She pointed.<\/p>\n
\u201cPayroll.\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cCould payroll always post into this category?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen did that change?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nora typed quickly.<\/p>\n
Her face went still.<\/p>\n
\u201cThree years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho changed it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn't.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho had permission?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFinance systems administrators.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe five.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNames.\u201d<\/p>\n
She pulled the access log.<\/p>\n
One of them was Grant.<\/p>\n
I stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy would Operations have finance-system administrator access?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nora shook her head.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey shouldn't.\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter looked at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho approved it?\u201d<\/p>\n
The log showed an access request.<\/p>\n
Requested by Grant Hart.<\/p>\n
Approved by Peter Lang.<\/p>\n
Peter stopped breathing for a moment.<\/p>\n
\u201cI approved this?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nora opened the original ticket.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Peter's digital authorization.<\/p>\n
He sat down.<\/p>\n
\u201cI approve hundreds of access requests.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat one gave Grant the ability to alter cost mappings,\u201d Nora said.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought it was reporting access.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe ticket description says expanded operational analytics.\u201d<\/p>\n
I read the line.<\/p>\n
Perfect corporate language.<\/p>\n
Accurate enough to pass.<\/p>\n
Vague enough to conceal what mattered.<\/p>\n
Peter closed his eyes briefly.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe used my approval.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo,\u201d Nora said quietly. \u201cHe used the access you gave him.\u201d<\/p>\n
The distinction hurt.<\/p>\n
I could see it.<\/p>\n
That afternoon, I interviewed Nora with outside counsel present.<\/p>\n
She explained how the accounting category worked. Operational recovery credits reduced service expenses. Lower service expenses improved reported operating performance. Depending on where the credit landed, the effect could raise department margins without drawing the attention a direct payroll reduction report might receive.<\/p>\n
\u201cCould Grant see those results?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould he see technician-level deductions?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot automatically.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut with administrator access?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould he change mappings?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUntil Friday, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould he erase transactions?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. Not cleanly.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo there's a history.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAll of it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf backups exist.\u201d<\/p>\n
IT confirmed they did.<\/p>\n
At six that evening, I finally called Laura.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're still there.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYeah.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou promised Mia you'd be home for dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
I checked the clock.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
The word carried no anger.<\/p>\n
That was worse.<\/p>\n
\u201cI lost track.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is starting to sound familiar.\u201d<\/p>\n
I leaned back against the wall.<\/p>\n
She didn't have to explain.<\/p>\n
Hartwell had already taken enough nights.<\/p>\n
The investigation didn't become noble simply because I cared about the reason now.<\/p>\n
\u201cI'll leave.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you actually leaving?\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked through the glass toward Peter and Nora still working over old access logs.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then she softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you find something?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow bad?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat means bad.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProbably.\u201d<\/p>\n
I drove home before seven.<\/p>\n
Mia had saved me a slice of pizza.<\/p>\n
She talked for ten minutes about a school project involving a cardboard bridge. I listened carefully. Not performatively. Carefully.<\/p>\n
After she went upstairs, Laura sat beside me on the couch.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou looked at your phone four times during dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn't answer it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's not the same thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She waited.<\/p>\n
I told her about the hidden accounting category.<\/p>\n
About the access Grant should never have had.<\/p>\n
About how the deductions reduced operating costs.<\/p>\n
About bonuses tied to margins.<\/p>\n
Laura listened until I finished.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo your money made somebody's numbers look better.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPotentially.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDon't say potentially to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe haven't proven intent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou think it was accidental?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI think we have to prove it wasn't.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked toward the hallway where Mia had disappeared.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd how long will that take?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDays.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou have one week before Meridian expects paperwork.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd three weeks until you start.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you still want to start there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
My answer came too fast.<\/p>\n
Laura noticed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen remember that.\u201d<\/p>\n
The next morning, Peter called me before I reached Hartwell.<\/p>\n
His voice sounded strained.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel, get here.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIT restored an archived mailbox.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhose?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant's old account.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did they find?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA folder he deleted eighteen months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
I tightened my grip on the steering wheel.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat's in it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter took a breath.<\/p>\n
\u201cEmails about margin recovery.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHundreds.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOne of them references you.\u201d<\/p>\n
I went silent.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does it say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Peter read only the subject line.<\/p>\n
Mercer escalation risk.<\/p>\n
I drove the rest of the way without turning on the radio.<\/p>\n
Grant did not leave the conference room when Evelyn told him the review would continue. For several seconds he remained perfectly still, one hand resting against the polished table, as … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13557,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13562"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13562\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13615,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13562\/revisions\/13615"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}