The footage did not show Victor touching Thomas\u2019s car.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
The camera faced the rear gate, not the service bays.<\/p>\n
At 8:36 p.m., the man with the black square ring entered.<\/p>\n
At 8:49, he left.<\/p>\n
Thomas collected his vehicle the following morning.<\/p>\n
Five weeks later, he complained that a brake fitting had been loosened.<\/p>\n
Then, after another service visit, he died when a brake line failed.<\/p>\n
The chronology was deeply suspicious.<\/p>\n
It was not yet a complete chain.<\/p>\n
Police reopened the investigation into Thomas Whitmore\u2019s death.<\/p>\n
Sarah cried when Harrison told her.<\/p>\n
Not loudly.<\/p>\n
She pressed her fist against her mouth and turned away from the camera.<\/p>\n
Emily gave her the silence she needed.<\/p>\n
When Sarah finally spoke, she said, \u201cI spent two years telling myself Dad caused the crash because he drove too fast.\u201d<\/p>\n
Harrison answered gently.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe still do not know the legal cause of his death.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sarah nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
She had learned the phrase too.<\/p>\n
Verification before conclusion.<\/p>\n
That evening, Mark visited Leo under supervision.<\/p>\n
He seemed distracted.<\/p>\n
Emily nearly asked whether he wanted to cancel.<\/p>\n
Then Leo sneezed milk onto Mark\u2019s shirt.<\/p>\n
For the first time all day, Mark laughed.<\/p>\n
The sound startled both of them.<\/p>\n
He wiped Leo\u2019s mouth with a cloth.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe has your timing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy timing is excellent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe waited until I changed shirts.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExactly.\u201d<\/p>\n
The exchange lasted only seconds.<\/p>\n
Then the distance returned.<\/p>\n
Emily watched Mark hold their son.<\/p>\n
There was tenderness in him.<\/p>\n
There had always been tenderness.<\/p>\n
That was why betrayal could not be reduced to a cartoon.<\/p>\n
Mark had not been pretending every morning he warmed bottles or every night he carried Leo through the hallway when the baby would not sleep.<\/p>\n
He had loved them.<\/p>\n
He had also hidden financial danger, manipulated Emily\u2019s choices, and tried to control her exit from the family.<\/p>\n
Love did not cancel conduct.<\/p>\n
Conduct did not make every loving moment false.<\/p>\n
Emily was learning to hold both without forcing either to disappear.<\/p>\n
After the visit, Mark lingered near the front door.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel says prosecutors may want me to testify about Victor.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen listen to Daniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI will.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily almost smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cGrowth.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mark accepted the sarcasm.<\/p>\n
Then his expression changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s something else.\u201d<\/p>\n
She waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy father wants to meet you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI assumed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why mention it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause he says he has information about Thomas\u2019s crash.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cTell Harrison.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Richard want?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo speak to you directly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says he won\u2019t give the information otherwise.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen he can explain that to investigators.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mark nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s what I told him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily looked at him more carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou told Richard no again.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m practicing.\u201d<\/p>\n
The remark almost sounded like the old Mark.<\/p>\n
She did not let nostalgia decide anything.<\/p>\n
\u201cGood night.\u201d<\/p>\n
He left.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s attempt to bargain lasted less than twelve hours.<\/p>\n
By morning, investigators had contacted his attorney.<\/p>\n
Whatever leverage Richard imagined he possessed diminished quickly when the alternative involved obstructing a reopened death investigation.<\/p>\n
He agreed to an interview.<\/p>\n
Emily did not attend.<\/p>\n
Harrison later provided the portion relevant to her civil matters.<\/p>\n
Richard admitted that, approximately six weeks before Thomas died, Victor told him Thomas had uncovered \u201csensitive reserve information.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat reserve?\u201d investigators asked.<\/p>\n
Richard claimed he believed Victor meant Seventeen North.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you instruct Victor to stop Thomas?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI instructed him to find out what Thomas had.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConversation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFinancial pressure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf necessary.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cViolence?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know Thomas believed someone had tampered with his brakes?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily stopped reading.<\/p>\n
He had known.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen did you learn?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter Thomas complained to Victor.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVictor told you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought Thomas was being dramatic.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer was horrifying precisely because it was ordinary.<\/p>\n
Richard had dismissed the warning.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Victor tell you he visited the repair shop?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you send him there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Evelyn?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot to my knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever authorize physical harm against Thomas?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard then volunteered something.<\/p>\n
Two days before Thomas died, he and Victor had argued.<\/p>\n
Victor wanted permission to recover copies Thomas had taken.<\/p>\n
Richard refused.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Thomas was my brother.\u201d<\/p>\n
The investigator challenged him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou had already damaged his business.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard did not deny it.<\/p>\n
\u201cBusiness pressure is reversible.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd brake failure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI did not know Victor had touched his vehicle.\u201d<\/p>\n
That phrasing mattered.<\/p>\n
Not if.<\/p>\n
Had.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy do you believe he did?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause after Thomas died, Victor came to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe next morning.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat the problem was over.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily\u2019s skin went cold.<\/p>\n
The investigator asked Richard exactly what he understood.<\/p>\n
\u201cI asked whether he meant Thomas.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe told me not to ask questions I didn\u2019t want answered.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you do?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard looked down in the recorded transcript.<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
Nothing.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause my brother was dead.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is precisely why most people would ask.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s answer took several seconds.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was afraid of what he would say.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily set the pages down.<\/p>\n
Richard Whitmore, who had spent decades convincing everyone that control was courage, had been afraid to ask his employee whether he killed his brother.<\/p>\n
Harrison watched her.<\/p>\n
\u201cContinue.\u201d<\/p>\n
There was more.<\/p>\n
Richard had considered firing Victor.<\/p>\n
He did not.<\/p>\n
Victor possessed too much information.<\/p>\n
Instead Richard reduced his access while quietly preparing to restructure several companies.<\/p>\n
Victor noticed.<\/p>\n
That explained why Victor began building stronger independent leverage.<\/p>\n
M-42 expanded.<\/p>\n
Payments increased.<\/p>\n
Evelyn became more important to him.<\/p>\n
The family machine had continued operating after Thomas\u2019s death because every person inside it feared exposing the others.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s silence protected Victor.<\/p>\n
Victor\u2019s records constrained Richard.<\/p>\n
Evelyn\u2019s reserve gave her independence.<\/p>\n
Marianne enabled Evelyn.<\/p>\n
Mark obeyed enough to preserve continuity.<\/p>\n
Thomas\u2019s death did not end the structure.<\/p>\n
It stabilized it.<\/p>\n
Until Emily began tracing her own two hundred thousand dollars.<\/p>\n
At noon, Harrison received a message from Victor.<\/p>\n
Not through his lawyer.<\/p>\n
Directly.<\/p>\n
An encrypted email arrived at Harrison\u2019s firm.<\/p>\n
Subject:<\/p>\n
MERCER.<\/p>\n
The message contained no greeting.<\/p>\n
You are building the wrong murder case.<\/p>\n
Harrison immediately preserved it and notified investigators.<\/p>\n
A second message arrived three minutes later.<\/p>\n
I was at the shop. I did not kill Thomas.<\/p>\n
Emily read over Harrison\u2019s shoulder.<\/p>\n
Then a third.<\/p>\n
Ask Richard what he paid Northline on October 14.<\/p>\n
The date was six days before Thomas died.<\/p>\n
Emily\u2019s pulse rose.<\/p>\n
Investigators obtained the relevant records.<\/p>\n
Northline had received $75,000 from a Whitmore subsidiary.<\/p>\n
Description:<\/p>\n
SPECIAL RESOLUTION.<\/p>\n
The phrase from the old archive ledger.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s initials appeared beside the authorization.<\/p>\n
Mark stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cSpecial resolution.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily remembered thirty-one such entries.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did it mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
No one had established that.<\/p>\n
Now Victor was pointing directly toward one.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s attorney was contacted.<\/p>\n
Richard initially claimed not to remember the payment.<\/p>\n
Records refreshed his memory.<\/p>\n
It was a discretionary security retainer.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard resisted.<\/p>\n
Then finally answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cTo recover company property.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom Thomas?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat property?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCopies.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho received the money?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNorthline.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho controlled Northline?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVictor.\u201d<\/p>\n
The picture darkened.<\/p>\n
Six days before Thomas died, Richard paid Victor seventy-five thousand dollars to recover documents from Thomas.<\/p>\n
\u201cBy what means?\u201d investigators asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhatever lawful means were necessary.\u201d<\/p>\n
That qualifier sounded suspiciously convenient.<\/p>\n
Victor sent another message.<\/p>\n
Lawful was added after Thomas died.<\/p>\n
Harrison stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
If true, original documentation might establish what Richard actually authorized.<\/p>\n
The M-42 archive contained a copy.<\/p>\n
The examiner located it within hours.<\/p>\n
The original work authorization had no word lawful.<\/p>\n
It read:<\/p>\n
Recover T.W. copies. Full discretion. Resolve permanently.<\/p>\n
Emily felt the air leave her lungs.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s signature appeared at the bottom.<\/p>\n
Full discretion.<\/p>\n
Resolve permanently.<\/p>\n
Mark looked physically ill.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s an order.\u201d<\/p>\n
Harrison corrected him.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is language that requires explanation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat explanation makes that good?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI did not say good.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s lawyer requested an immediate supplemental interview.<\/p>\n
Richard claimed \u201cresolve permanently\u201d meant end the document problem permanently.<\/p>\n
Not kill Thomas.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy use full discretion?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I trusted Victor to handle security matters.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you understand Victor sometimes used threats?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you understand he had pressured Peter Lang?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know he had surveilled Thomas?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen what limits did you impose?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard had no good answer.<\/p>\n
Emily saw the distinction clearly.<\/p>\n
There might never have been a spoken murder order.<\/p>\n
But Richard had given a dangerous man broad authority to \u201cresolve\u201d his brother while knowing that man used intimidation.<\/p>\n
Whether that amounted to criminal responsibility was for investigators and courts.<\/p>\n
Morally, the distance Richard had spent years constructing looked very thin.<\/p>\n
Victor\u2019s next message complicated it again.<\/p>\n
I took the money. I went to the shop. I loosened nothing.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
Thomas asked me to go.<\/p>\n
Emily stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
Another message arrived.<\/p>\n
He thought someone had already touched the car. He wanted me to see whether the shop had cameras.<\/p>\n
That could explain Victor\u2019s presence.<\/p>\n
It could also be an elaborate lie built around evidence he knew investigators had found.<\/p>\n
Harrison did not respond directly.<\/p>\n
Police negotiators took over communication.<\/p>\n
Victor eventually agreed to send a statement through his attorney.<\/p>\n
His account was specific.<\/p>\n
Thomas called him after noticing the soft brake pedal.<\/p>\n
He suspected sabotage.<\/p>\n
He did not want to involve Richard.<\/p>\n
Victor went to the repair shop after hours because he knew the owner and wanted to inspect surveillance coverage.<\/p>\n
He claimed he found nothing useful.<\/p>\n
Thomas later had the fitting repaired.<\/p>\n
Victor denied touching the vehicle.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn\u2019t he tell Thomas he already knew about the complaint when Thomas recorded him?\u201d Emily asked.<\/p>\n
Harrison read further.<\/p>\n
Victor said he realized Thomas was recording and deliberately acted uninformed.<\/p>\n
That was plausible.<\/p>\n
Conveniently plausible.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the seventy-five thousand?\u201d<\/p>\n
Victor admitted receiving it.<\/p>\n
He said Richard wanted Thomas\u2019s copied archive recovered.<\/p>\n
He kept the money and did not recover the records.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
Because, Victor claimed, he wanted Thomas to retain them as insurance against Richard.<\/p>\n
The old secret partnership again.<\/p>\n
Victor had been simultaneously paid to recover evidence and secretly benefited from its continued existence.<\/p>\n
That was exactly the kind of double dealing Daniel\u2019s drive documented.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why tell Richard the problem was over after Thomas died?\u201d Mark asked.<\/p>\n
Victor\u2019s statement answered.<\/p>\n
Because Richard was frightened, and frightened men were easier to control.<\/p>\n
Emily felt disgust.<\/p>\n
Even if Victor had not killed Thomas, he had exploited the death immediately.<\/p>\n
Then investigators asked the question that mattered.<\/p>\n
If Victor did not sabotage Thomas\u2019s car, who did?<\/p>\n
Victor provided a name.<\/p>\n
Not Richard.<\/p>\n
Not Evelyn.<\/p>\n
Not Marianne.<\/p>\n
A man called Owen Pike.<\/p>\n
Emily had never heard it.<\/p>\n
Mark had.<\/p>\n
His expression changed instantly.<\/p>\n
\u201cOwen worked for Northline.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVehicle security.\u201d<\/p>\n
Harrison searched the M-42 inventory.<\/p>\n
Owen Pike appeared in payment records.<\/p>\n
Former mechanic.<\/p>\n
Northline contractor.<\/p>\n
Multiple SPECIAL RESOLUTION payments.<\/p>\n
One payment occurred four days before Thomas died.<\/p>\n
$18,000.<\/p>\n
Authorized by Victor.<\/p>\n
Victor admitted paying him.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d investigators asked.<\/p>\n
Victor\u2019s answer was devastating.<\/p>\n
\u201cTo follow Thomas and recover the copies if he moved them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you tell Pike to damage the vehicle?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you tell him to frighten Thomas?\u201d<\/p>\n
Victor paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI left that to him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again the same architecture.<\/p>\n
Delegation without limits.<\/p>\n
Language designed to preserve deniability.<\/p>\n
Richard gave Victor discretion.<\/p>\n
Victor gave Pike discretion.<\/p>\n
Everyone claimed they wanted pressure, not violence.<\/p>\n
And Thomas ended up dead.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere is Owen Pike?\u201d Emily asked.<\/p>\n
Harrison looked at the investigator\u2019s update.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo current address.\u201d<\/p>\n
The last known employment record was six years old.<\/p>\n
Then the technician searching Daniel Mercer\u2019s drive found Pike\u2019s name.<\/p>\n
Not in a financial document.<\/p>\n
In one of Daniel\u2019s handwritten notes.<\/p>\n
O. Pike \u2014 asked about Emily. Told him nothing.<\/p>\n
The date was eight years before Thomas died.<\/p>\n
Emily\u2019s blood went cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cOwen knew my father?\u201d<\/p>\n
Harrison enlarged the scan.<\/p>\n
There was a second line beneath it.<\/p>\n
Thomas says Pike belongs to Victor. I think he belongs to Evelyn.<\/p>\n
Emily stared.<\/p>\n
Another man whose loyalty might not be what it appeared.<\/p>\n
They searched Evelyn\u2019s records.<\/p>\n
One old Northstar payment matched Owen Pike.<\/p>\n
Not through Victor.<\/p>\n
Directly from a Northstar subsidiary.<\/p>\n
Twenty-five thousand dollars.<\/p>\n
Nine years earlier.<\/p>\n
Emily looked toward Harrison.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn paid him before Victor did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
When confronted, Evelyn went silent.<\/p>\n
Her lawyer asked for a break.<\/p>\n
They returned twenty minutes later.<\/p>\n
Evelyn\u2019s face had changed.<\/p>\n
She looked frightened.<\/p>\n
Not defensive.<\/p>\n
Frightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy did you pay Owen Pike?\u201d Harrison asked.<\/p>\n
Evelyn swallowed.<\/p>\n
\u201cTo watch Thomas.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYears ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what purpose?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo find out what he had learned.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever ask Pike to damage Thomas\u2019s vehicle?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know Victor later hired him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know Pike was following Thomas when he died?\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn looked down.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mark whispered, \u201cMom.\u201d<\/p>\n
She closed her eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you tell anyone?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
Her answer barely carried through the speaker.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause the morning after Thomas died, Owen came to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
Emily felt her pulse hammer.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn opened her eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said Victor had gone too far.\u201d<\/p>\n
The footage did not show Victor touching Thomas\u2019s car. That mattered. The camera faced the rear gate, not the service bays. At 8:36 p.m., the man with the black square … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12977,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12995"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12995\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13019,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12995\/revisions\/13019"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/12977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}