Northstar Municipal Services did not manufacture anything.<\/p>\n
It administered payroll, scheduling, and employee benefits for local governments.<\/p>\n
Small cities.<\/p>\n
County offices.<\/p>\n
Public works departments.<\/p>\n
Libraries.<\/p>\n
School support staff.<\/p>\n
People whose employers contracted administrative functions because maintaining separate systems cost too much.<\/p>\n
That meant Martin\u2019s provider method had moved from private companies into public-sector benefits.<\/p>\n
The number of possible employees was enormous.<\/p>\n
Rebecca warned me not to assume five hundred imported provider records meant five hundred victims.<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome may never have been used.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome may be test records that were properly deactivated.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome may have been anonymized.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWere they?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe're checking.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen I understand that too.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sighed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're becoming difficult.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI was always difficult. You simply met me late.\u201d<\/p>\n
Northstar cooperated faster than Harrison had.<\/p>\n
That surprised everyone.<\/p>\n
Their general counsel apparently understood immediately that hiding would make the problem worse.<\/p>\n
Within ten days, they suspended the affected provider-matching module and hired an outside forensic firm.<\/p>\n
Within three weeks, they identified 512 imported records.<\/p>\n
Three hundred ninety-one contained real personal information.<\/p>\n
One hundred twenty-one had been partially anonymized.<\/p>\n
Of the real identities, seventy-four had been attached to reimbursement claims.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many authorized?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cTwenty-six confirmed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd the rest?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnder review.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas mine used?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rebecca hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many times?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTwo claims.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBy whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA municipal employee in another state.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo I know them?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they know me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they receive money?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEight hundred forty dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
Compared with everything else, the amount almost seemed trivial.<\/p>\n
That frightened me.<\/p>\n
Eight hundred forty dollars should not feel trivial when it had been attached to my name without permission.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Martin tell them to use me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy was I available?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour profile was marked verified legacy.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
Verified.<\/p>\n
The lie had become more trustworthy each time another system accepted it.<\/p>\n
Harrison trusted the original record.<\/p>\n
Larkwell trusted Harrison\u2019s export.<\/p>\n
BenefitBridge trusted Larkwell\u2019s configuration.<\/p>\n
Northstar trusted BenefitBridge\u2019s migration.<\/p>\n
Every transfer added institutional confidence.<\/p>\n
No one went backward far enough to ask the first question.<\/p>\n
Did Margaret Bennett ever agree?<\/p>\n
A falsehood repeated through enough systems began looking like infrastructure.<\/p>\n
Dorothy described it better.<\/p>\n
\u201cA rumor with a password.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruth wrote that down.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou're not restarting the spreadsheet,\u201d I warned.<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm collecting quotations.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor the book.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat book?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOur book.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is no book.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYet.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn laughed.<\/p>\n
Our kitchen meetings had become less frequent as formal investigations took over.<\/p>\n
I missed them.<\/p>\n
Not the fraud.<\/p>\n
The company.<\/p>\n
There is an intimacy among people who have been confused by the same impossible letter.<\/p>\n
Northstar notified every real person whose data had been imported.<\/p>\n
That produced new cases.<\/p>\n
A grandmother in Indiana whose identity had been used by three employees.<\/p>\n
A retired bus driver in Wisconsin.<\/p>\n
A former nanny in Ohio.<\/p>\n
A neighbor who had legitimately provided care once, seven years earlier.<\/p>\n
And one man named Arthur Cole who called Dana because he had never cared for children in his life.<\/p>\n
Arthur was eighty-three.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did they claim you did?\u201d I asked when Dana connected us.<\/p>\n
\u201cWatched twins.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHave you ever watched twins?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI avoid watching one child whenever possible.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo no.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbsolutely not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did your name get into the system?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI used to volunteer for a city recreation program.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Volunteer data again.<\/p>\n
Arthur sighed.<\/p>\n
\u201cI gave them information so I could teach woodworking to teenagers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd later it became childcare verification.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently I've had a career change.\u201d<\/p>\n
His humor reminded me of Dorothy.<\/p>\n
Then he became serious.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey had my taxpayer number.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat bothers me more than the money.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
He paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen I suppose you do.\u201d<\/p>\n
The federal investigation expanded because Northstar\u2019s clients crossed state lines and involved public funds.<\/p>\n
Martin\u2019s proposed plea became more complicated.<\/p>\n
Prosecutors postponed negotiations.<\/p>\n
His lawyers complained publicly that the government was moving the goalposts.<\/p>\n
I thought the goalposts had been standing still.<\/p>\n
Investigators were simply discovering how far away Martin had carried the ball.<\/p>\n
Then Northstar\u2019s forensic team found something unusual.<\/p>\n
One provider profile had administrative privileges.<\/p>\n
Providers were not supposed to have privileges.<\/p>\n
The profile could view enrollment statistics, test claim routing, and access migration tools.<\/p>\n
Name:<\/p>\n
Margaret Bennett.<\/p>\n
When Rebecca told me, I laughed.<\/p>\n
Not because it was funny.<\/p>\n
Because disbelief had run out of other sounds.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was an administrator?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour profile was.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid I have employees?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBenefits?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA pension?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMargaret.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm trying to understand my career.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dana covered her mouth to hide a smile.<\/p>\n
Rebecca continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe account appears to have been used as a test identity.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBy Martin?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHis credentials created it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDuring Northstar implementation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy mine?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe believe because your record consistently passed verification across prior systems.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
I was not merely a provider anymore.<\/p>\n
I was Martin\u2019s control sample.<\/p>\n
A known-good false identity.<\/p>\n
The thought was obscene.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did the account do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMostly test transactions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReal money?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome were reversed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOne was not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTwo hundred dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere did it go?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn internal test account linked to Martin\u2019s consulting firm.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dana leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo he used Margaret\u2019s identity to test whether funds could route to his own account.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's direct.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIs that why he's trying to plead?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
I asked to see the logs.<\/p>\n
Rebecca could not show everything.<\/p>\n
But she showed one sequence.<\/p>\n
MB_TEST_PROVIDER.<\/p>\n
Claim created.<\/p>\n
Verification bypass.<\/p>\n
Payment approved.<\/p>\n
Routing override.<\/p>\n
Consulting test account.<\/p>\n
Success.<\/p>\n
Then Martin wrote:<\/p>\n
MB remains reliable across environments.<\/p>\n
Reliable.<\/p>\n
I felt anger move through me slowly.<\/p>\n
He had described me as if I were software.<\/p>\n
Not a woman.<\/p>\n
Not a grandmother.<\/p>\n
A reliable false identity.<\/p>\n
Then another line:<\/p>\n
Preserve MB master. Useful for demonstrations.<\/p>\n
Dana whispered something I could not hear.<\/p>\n
I asked, \u201cDemonstrations to whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is what we're investigating.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer came from Martin himself.<\/p>\n
As part of plea negotiations, he disclosed that he had used selected provider identities during sales demonstrations to prospective clients.<\/p>\n
Not live claims, he insisted.<\/p>\n
Demonstrations.<\/p>\n
My name had appeared on screens in conference rooms I had never entered.<\/p>\n
Consultants had watched Margaret Bennett move through enrollment systems.<\/p>\n
Green checks.<\/p>\n
Verified.<\/p>\n
Approved.<\/p>\n
Reliable.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat information could they see?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUsually masked.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUsually.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy address?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDate of birth?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn some environments.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSocial Security number?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMasked.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFull number accessible?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo administrators.\u201d<\/p>\n
I rubbed my temples.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid anyone ever ask whether Margaret Bennett was a real person?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rebecca looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne client did.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMartin said you were a synthetic test profile.\u201d<\/p>\n
Synthetic.<\/p>\n
I laughed again.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA fictional identity created for software testing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know what the words mean.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe told them I wasn't real.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
For months I had fought because people used my real identity without asking.<\/p>\n
Now I learned that when someone finally asked who I was, Martin solved the problem by declaring I did not exist.<\/p>\n
That hurt differently.<\/p>\n
Dana noticed.<\/p>\n
\u201cMargaret?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI'm fine.\u201d<\/p>\n
I wasn't.<\/p>\n
But I would be.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid anyone believe him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course.\u201d<\/p>\n
A verified system record said Margaret Bennett existed.<\/p>\n
Martin said the person behind it did not.<\/p>\n
Both claims served him.<\/p>\n
That evening I sat alone at my dining table.<\/p>\n
No reports.<\/p>\n
No calls.<\/p>\n
No television.<\/p>\n
Just Lily\u2019s purple drawing on the wall.<\/p>\n
My face in the center.<\/p>\n
NANA MONEY.<\/p>\n
I thought about identity.<\/p>\n
We use the word as though it were one thing.<\/p>\n
But my identity lived in different places.<\/p>\n
My name on Robert\u2019s marriage certificate.<\/p>\n
Mrs. Bennett on classroom doors.<\/p>\n
Mom in Emily\u2019s phone.<\/p>\n
Nana in Lily\u2019s mouth.<\/p>\n
Margaret Bennett in government records.<\/p>\n
MB in Martin\u2019s database.<\/p>\n
The same person.<\/p>\n
Different meanings.<\/p>\n
Martin\u2019s mistake was believing the administrative version was the only one that mattered to his system.<\/p>\n
He could copy MB.<\/p>\n
He could move MB.<\/p>\n
He could approve MB.<\/p>\n
He could even tell clients MB was fictional.<\/p>\n
But the real woman remained outside the database.<\/p>\n
Eventually she answered the phone.<\/p>\n
The next morning I called Rebecca.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want to testify.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou probably will.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. I mean I don't want a plea deal that removes the need.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat isn't your decision.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why tell me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I don't want Martin\u2019s final record to become another administrative summary.\u201d<\/p>\n
She was quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you want the court to understand?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat he didn't steal numbers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he steal?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople\u2019s authority over their own names.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rebecca wrote that down.<\/p>\n
I could hear the pen.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe relied on the idea that nobody would care enough to trace small amounts.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOkay.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut each small amount required a person to become less important than the paperwork attached to them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her voice softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cI do.\u201d<\/p>\n
Martin\u2019s plea negotiations stalled.<\/p>\n
His attorneys wanted fewer identity-related counts.<\/p>\n
Prosecutors refused.<\/p>\n
Brian Shea pleaded guilty first.<\/p>\n
He admitted submitting false childcare claims and paying Martin a percentage.<\/p>\n
The BenefitBridge manager followed, admitting he helped transfer provider data into unauthorized environments.<\/p>\n
Troy received a nonprosecution agreement conditioned on truthful testimony and restitution for the Evelyn claim.<\/p>\n
Evelyn called me after hearing.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know how I feel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don't have to.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe used my name.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut he told them everything.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd he's paying it back.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould you be angry if I forgive him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould you forgive him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot my decision.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sighed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou are annoyingly consistent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI practice.\u201d<\/p>\n
Derek\u2019s sentencing came next.<\/p>\n
The judge imposed probation, community service, financial monitoring, and a formal fraud conviction.<\/p>\n
He was ordered to continue cooperating.<\/p>\n
He apologized in court.<\/p>\n
Not to Harrison.<\/p>\n
To me.<\/p>\n
To Emily.<\/p>\n
To Lily, though she was not present.<\/p>\n
He said he had turned his insecurity into entitlement.<\/p>\n
That phrase sounded rehearsed.<\/p>\n
Then he added something that did not.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought being ashamed of what I was doing meant I wasn't the kind of person who did things like that.\u201d<\/p>\n
The courtroom became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut I kept doing it.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was the truest thing he said.<\/p>\n
Afterward, Emily stood with him outside the courtroom.<\/p>\n
I stayed several yards away.<\/p>\n
They spoke privately.<\/p>\n
Later she told me he had asked whether there was any chance they could rebuild their marriage.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you sure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked sad.<\/p>\n
But not uncertain.<\/p>\n
\u201cI told him I believe he's changing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI told him I want him to become someone Lily can trust.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut I don't want to be married while he proves it.\u201d<\/p>\n
I took her hand.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds clear.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe cried.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI imagine.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI cried too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn't make the decision wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
The divorce became final six weeks later.<\/p>\n
No celebration.<\/p>\n
No dramatic relief.<\/p>\n
Emily came to my house afterward.<\/p>\n
We ordered Chinese food.<\/p>\n
Lily complained about broccoli.<\/p>\n
Life continued.<\/p>\n
Then Rebecca called at eight thirty the next morning.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe found the original MB master file.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one Martin said to preserve?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEncrypted archive provided by the BenefitBridge manager.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA complete provider profile template.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy data?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cInstructions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor using me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor cloning a verified provider identity into new environments.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many times was it copied?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe're counting.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRebecca.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIs there something you're not saying?\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe file has a title.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat title?\u201d<\/p>\n
She read it.<\/p>\n
NANA MODEL \u2014 BENNETT TEMPLATE.<\/p>\n
For a moment I could not speak.<\/p>\n
Nana.<\/p>\n
The word had traveled farther than I knew.<\/p>\n
Not merely Troy\u2019s joke.<\/p>\n
Not merely Lily overhearing Derek.<\/p>\n
Martin had used it too.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Derek give him that name?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen was the file created?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter Derek\u2019s first successful claims.\u201d<\/p>\n
The phrase Nana money had not simply been family slang.<\/p>\n
It had become part of the scheme\u2019s internal language.<\/p>\n
I asked, \u201cWhat do the instructions say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rebecca hesitated.<\/p>\n
Then read the first line.<\/p>\n
Start with a real, low-contact family provider. Once verified, the identity can serve as a durable model for subsequent enrollment testing.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
A durable model.<\/p>\n
That was what I had become.<\/p>\n
But farther down the document was one sentence Martin never intended any provider to read.<\/p>\n
Rebecca\u2019s voice changed as she read it.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe system works because the provider does not know there is anything to challenge.\u201d<\/p>\n
There.<\/p>\n
The central truth.<\/p>\n
Not confusion.<\/p>\n
Not bureaucratic flexibility.<\/p>\n
Not helping families.<\/p>\n
The method required ignorance.<\/p>\n
Our ignorance was not an unfortunate side effect.<\/p>\n
It was the control.<\/p>\n
I opened my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cRebecca.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMake sure the judge sees that sentence.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe will.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Because after months of hearing people explain what they intended, what they assumed, what they believed benefits were for, and why paperwork seemed secondary, Martin had finally supplied the simplest description himself.<\/p>\n
The system worked because I did not know.<\/p>\n
And the moment Lily asked one innocent question at Sunday dinner, it began to fail.<\/p>\n
Northstar Municipal Services did not manufacture anything. It administered payroll, scheduling, and employee benefits for local governments. Small cities. County offices. Public works departments. Libraries. School support staff. People whose … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10630,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insightdrama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10646"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10646\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10666,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10646\/revisions\/10666"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insightdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}